SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jay who wrote (249)8/3/1998 12:27:00 AM
From: Catfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Jay,
Obviously, you think that these groups have done nothing wrong. I guess that you probably feel the same way about Clinton. Of course, to believe otherwise would betray your ideology. You probably think this is JUST about sex, but tell us why Monica Wolinsky was granted transactional immunity if this was just about sex. Oh by the way, you probably have never even heard of travelgate, filegate, and how about trooper gate? Don't you read any of the articles that I post here on this site? Probably not....it would spoil your ignorance. I think Tony Snow had a very good idea today by suggesting that Clinton pay back some of the $40 million that his misdeeds have cost the taxpayers.

Check this link again and ask yourself about the character of your "Boy."

exchange2000.com




To: Jay who wrote (249)8/3/1998 3:35:00 AM
From: halfscot  Respond to of 13994
 
Starr can only do what he is permitted, requested, and mandated to do by the IC law and the attorney general. If he goes outside those mandates he's toast. If the evidence didn't keep piling up then the "others" wouldn't keep piling up for investigation. I guess people don't want to understand this because it goes against the "Starr is out of control" theory of attacking their boy. What will you say once another IC is appointed to investigate the campaign finance abuses. You won't have Starr to kick around any more. Guess it'll be time to fire up the PIs on the government payroll to dig up dirt on the new IC once he/she is appointed.

What we see now are just the few ants you see outside of a fire ant mound, disguising what lies underneath, just before you step into it.

halfscot



To: Jay who wrote (249)8/3/1998 9:32:00 AM
From: Ray Emery  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Maybe there should be a permanent "Office for the Investigation of the President and First Lady".

If the shoe fits....
Maybe so, at least until they are out of office.

Ray