Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Drew Williams who wrote (718)	8/3/1998 12:38:00 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 880

<<I do not believe the Clinton administration is particularly evil or corrupt, as these things go, certainly no more than other recent administrations. Obviously, some people disagree, but I have not yet found any organized data that would prove one position or another. I'm still looking and have enlisted the assistance of several research professionals in the publishing industry.>> I read the above to mean you don't think Clinton's admin is corrupt because you have not found organized data that could prove it. I supplied a list of 43 convictions organized by crime. What is so difficult for you to understand?

To: Drew Williams who wrote (718)	8/3/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 880

Seems like we ought to compare the numbers to Bush OR Reagan but not both. Moreover, I doubt very much during the Reagan administration or the Bush administration that we had so many cabinet level officials now or formerly under active investigation such as O'Leary, Babbitt, Espy and Brown. The list of convictions of Clinton characters is also impressive and there is no such impressive list from the Reagan/Bush years. JLA