Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Computer Associates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rupert1 who wrote (2852)	8/3/1998 4:28:00 PM
From: Jimbo Cobb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5232

CA at $30...WoW !!!! WHAT A POUNDING THIS SUCKER HAS TAKEN !!!! Time to get back in or still more on the downside ??? Jimbo.

To: rupert1 who wrote (2852)	8/3/1998 5:48:00 PM
From: The Rancher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5232

SOP 97-2 was designed to "insulate" software companies from customers defaulting on multiyear agreements. given that most s/w companies are small, FASB feels that the conservative nature of SOP 97-2 is in the best interests of small companies that can't afford to have a customer default on a multiyear deal. thus far, some companies have seen their stock hit because of resulting revenue reclassifications. but the bottom line is that 97-2 just extends the pipeline (in most cases) because the contract is still in place, the revenue will (in most cases) still come in, and everything will be fine and dandy. except there is a loophole... the little known loophole in 97-2 is that if you are a large s/w company that has been recognizing multiyear deal revenue up front (sound familiar?) and HAVE A PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF CUSTOMERS PAYING ON SCHEDULE (ie not defaulting), you may continue to operate under that scheme. very few companies fit this description, except of course, CA. therefore the company can continue to recognize these large deals up front, so SOP 97-2 should not be an issue for CA. however, as we all know, the problem for CA is that customers do not want to make these large deals anymore (at least some of them don't) according to the company. -ranch it up