Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GLOW - Global Games, Inc. - Great Profit Potential ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Davis who wrote (5825)	8/3/1998 11:02:00 PM
From: Selfop	Respond to of 8879

Even big corporations have problems. \| Next \| Respond \| Earnings \| Schoengold & Sporn, P.C. Files Class Action with Extended Class Period Against Cendant Corporation July 31, 1998 03:29 PM NEW YORK, July 31 /PRNewswire/ -- Notice is hereby given that on July 31, 1998 a securities class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Cendant Corporation ("Cendant" or the "Company") CD and certain officers and directors of the Company, on behalf of purchasers of Cendant and CUC International securities during the period March 21, 1995 to April 15, 1998, inclusive (the "Class Period"). The Complaint asserts claims under the federal securities laws, including claims for violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and SEC Rule l0b-5. The lawsuit alleges that Cendant and CUC, which combined with HFS Inc. to form Cendant, and certain of their officers and directors engaged in a scheme to artificially inflate the market price of Cendant and CUC common stock during the Class Period. During the Class Period, Cendant's and CUC's financial reporting did not comply with generally accepted accounting principles. On April 15, 1998 Cendant reported that accounting irregularities would cause it to restate earnings from 1995, 1996, and 1997 and to revise its 1997 operating income downward by approximately $100 to $115 million. This improper accounting had the effect of materially inflating Cendant's and CUC's reported earnings and enabled at least one insider to sell Cendant stock at artificially inflated prices while possessing material, adverse, non-public information. The Plaintiffs seek to recover damages on their own behalf and on behalf of all purchasers of Cendant and CUC common stock. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of the class members, and is represented by the law firm of Schoengold & Sporn, P.C., 233 Broadway, New York, New York 10279, 212-964-0046, Fax: 212-267-8137, E-Mail: SCHOENGOLD@AOL.COM. For the past 30 years, Schoengold & Sporn has specialized in representing victims of securities fraud violations. During that time, the firm -- acting as lead or co-lead counsel or a member of an Executive Committee -- has helped to recover hundreds of millions of dollars for injured shareholders, including a $77.5 million settlement in the famous Wedtech securities litigation, which was heralded by the Wall Street Journal as one of the largest settlements of any private securities fraud case (see Wall Street Journal 2/10/92, p. B-6) which stated: "$77.5 million settlement ... reached in a securities fraud case stemming from the Wedtech scandal ... The settlement with 29 defendants ... is believed to be one of the largest ever in a civil securities fraud case ... 'This is a global settlement,' said Samuel P. Sporn, a plaintiffs attorney at the New York law firm Schoengold & Sporn. Mr. Sporn said the settlement represents almost half of the more than $160 million in stocks and bonds that Wedtech sold to the public between 1983 and 1986." (Mr. Sporn Member of Executive Committee) If you are a member of the class described above, you may, not later than 60 days from April 17, 1998, move the Court for an order to serve as a lead plaintiff, provided you meet certain legal requirements. If you wish to discuss this action, or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests with respect to this matter, please contact Jay P. Saltzman, Esq. or Rosemary McBride at 233 Broadway, New York, New York 10279, or e-mail at SCH0ENG0LD@A0L.C0M. SOURCE Schoengold & Sporn, P.C.

To: Bob Davis who wrote (5825)	8/3/1998 11:12:00 PM
From: Selfop	Respond to of 8879

So Bob, You looked through your email regarding GLOW and found one that praised you and you linked it to your letter. There are no words to describe your actions, your behavior and the irresponsible manner you conduct affairs over the internet.

To: Bob Davis who wrote (5825)	8/3/1998 11:36:00 PM
From: MY OPINION	Respond to of 8879

Bob, Do your 7,000+ readership pay for your trash rumor letter?

To: Bob Davis who wrote (5825)	8/3/1998 11:39:00 PM
From: Selfop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8879

Bob, Perhaps you could redo that email link and provide the email address of responders. Did it ever occur to you that you are the one responsible for people losing money on GLOW by your negative reports. Perhaps a more moderate approach would be to give the company more time to follow through on their business plan. You are trying to stonewall GLOW at the same time GLOW is trying to produce revenue streams. IMO, you jumped the gun. You have hurt, not helped investors. I'd give GLOW another six months to a year and if they fail to produce I'll send you an email to start investigating this company. The price of GLOW has settled now and it will take revenue streams and profits for any appreciable gain. IMO

To: Bob Davis who wrote (5825)	8/4/1998 9:44:00 AM
From: BigRedMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8879

I'm sorry, Bob! I gave you ample opportunity to print a retraction. I warned you I would not be easy on you as I have been on others because I hold you to a higher standard. You have failed to follow through on your obligation to be a stand-up guy. I have no choice but to expose you for what you are! Those who have come to know me over the past several weeks are aware that I am very judicious with the term "liar". I have yet to accuse ANYONE of committing a lie, even in the face of substantial circumstantial evidence. Bob Davis, you are a LIAR! And, I'll prove it! In post # 5825 Message 5400630 you said. . . I'm sorry but your preceding statement is not correct. That statement was a response to Bodie's post #5823, in which he said. . . Wrong. The article refers to July 7 press release. Bobs whole premise is based on his believing the interview took place after the 30 July release, and therefore the belief that Julius Timothy was refuting the 30 July article. You and Bob are wrong, and he still persists. Now, let's just take a look at your post #5603 to Endwrench, shall we? Message 5384128 To: endwrench (5601 ) (Trial Member) From: Bob Davis Saturday, Aug 1 1998 2:04PM ET Reply # of 5858 Guys, I suggest that you look at the article in The Independent....really, really hard.... If you do you will see a HTML link to the July 30th GLOW press release. Mr. Julius Timothy is specifically refuting GLOW's July 30th press release. I'm sorry but I had already looked at that specific issue before I ever made my first post. I specifically wanted to make sure exactly "what" Mr. Timothy was refuting. Bob Davis The Napeague Letter napeague.com Bob, I made a very simple request to you. I merely asked that you RETRACT your assertion and issue an apology. You have now gotten yourself in deeper water. Bob, I suggest you begin making amends ASAP!! Serious as a Heart Attack! GO BIG RED!!