SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1799)8/4/1998 12:11:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 12823
 
Last Mile THIS! Utilities Join the Internet-Access Business

August 3, 1998



By MATT RICHTEL

There's a new power in the Internet access business: your utility company.

A growing number of electric companies -- once slow-moving,
government-regulated monopolies -- are getting into one of the most rapidly
changing businesses. At least 100 utility companies offer Internet access, including
more than 30 of the nation's biggest electricity providers, and dozens of others may
follow suit.

At the larger end are the likes of Arizona Public Service, whose Phoenix-based
subsidiary, Cyber Trails, has grown into one of the top 10 Internet service
companies in the state. At the other end of the spectrum is Plumas-Sierra Rural
Electric Cooperative, a power provider nestled in the Northern Sierra Nevada
mountains that also serves about 2,000 dial-up Internet customers.

Large or small, electric companies are moving into the Internet business because of
utility deregulation. Eighteen states have opened their power industries to some form
of competition, and most others are expected eventually to do so as well. That
means the utilities not only have to learn to compete, they have more reason to seek
new sources of revenue.

Moreover, many power companies already have the telecommunications
infrastructures that their Internet subsidiaries could use to serve outside customers.

So more than 100 utilities have turned to telecommunications, including
long-distance, wireless and local phone service, cable television access, home
security systems and, now, Internet access.

"We have another business in this building, another way to pay rent," said Robert
Marshall, general manager of Plumas-Sierra and its Internet access subsidiary,
Plumas-Sierra Local Net. "It will help us hold our own in the big wide world when
electricity deregulation hits."

The power companies are joining a host of other businesses in trying to own a piece
of the ground floor of cyberspace. Aspiring Internet access providers range from
mom-and-pop operations to giant long-distance carriers like AT&T, MCI
Communications and Sprint, and radio and cable television stations. Even while there
has been some consolidation among large and regional Internet service providers,
their overall number has exploded to 4,850 from 1,500 in the last five years,
according to Boardwatch Magazine, an industry trade journal.

The growth and diversity of Internet service providers means "you can't even
recognize what an ISP is anymore," said Jack Rickard, editor of Boardwatch.

For their part, power companies say providing Internet services is a natural move for
them. Across the country, many of the 180 large, investor-owned utilities own large
fiber-optic networks that they built for internal communication across states and
among power plants and field offices. They used only a portion of the capacity,
however, eventually leasing it out to telecommunications businesses. Now, they are
developing their own telecommunications businesses, including Internet access, said
John Castagna, a spokesman for the Edison Electric Institute, an electric industry
trade group.

Castagna said 30 to 40 major utilities were offering Internet access and others were
considering it.

Further, the power companies say they understand other crucial aspects of the
Internet business: billing, customer service and computer networking.

"You already have expertise on the communications and you already have expertise
on the computer networking," said Ben Preusser, business manager for Cyber Trails
in Phoenix. "All you need to do is drop a line to the Internet."

Of course, it is not quite that easy. Since the utilities themselves are regulated, any
costs from the Internet business cannot be passed on to power customers in the form
of higher rates. So the Internet subsidiaries must pay fees for using the utilities'
telecommunications infrastructure, and the start-up costs are the responsibility of the
utilities' parent companies and their shareholders, not the utilities' rate payers.

Arizona Public Service invested more than $2 million to get its Cyber Trails
subsidiary up and running, Preusser said. This involved buying modems, routers --
which route Internet traffic to the proper destination -- and establishing a high-speed
line into the backbone of the Internet. Cyber Trails also leases data lines from US
West and from Arizona Public Service.

Cyber Trails, which began offering Internet access in March 1997, has 6,000 dial-up
customers, adds 20 new ones a day, and has one of the 10 largest subscriber bases
in the state, Preusser said. He said the company had marketed aggressively, going
after rural areas that national Internet service providers had ignored, and also had
contracts to provide access to several Indian reservations.

Preusser said the new business was helping Arizona Public Service learn about the
challenges of moving into a new business in a competitive marketplace -- knowledge
that should prove beneficial as the utility heads into a deregulated and much more
competitive electricity marketplace.

"It's a different set of skills," he said. "It turns out that just leveraging your existing
technology doesn't work all that great."

Carol Heiberger, an energy and telecommunications consultant in Philadelphia, has a
similar view, noting that the relatively low cost of offering Internet access gives
utilities the chance to experiment with a new business model. "They're practicing
running a competitive business to see what it looks like," she said.

But Ms. Heiberger, who has written extensively on the efforts by utilities to offer
Internet access, said there was no guarantee that power companies could succeed in
this business. On the one hand, she said, they have infrastructure, marketing, brand
recognition and customer service experience; on the other, they are not accustomed
to the fast-moving world of technology.

Still, the potential problems did not discourage Carolina Power and Light, which
serves 1.1 million residences with electricity, from entering the Internet business. In
January, it acquired Interpath Communications, a company that provides consulting,
Web page hosting and design, and Internet access to 4,500 businesses in North
Carolina, as well as surrounding states.

The experience of Carolina Power and Light also highlights an approach taken by dozens of utility companies entering the telecommunications business: Rather than building from scratch, as in Arizona, they are buying existing Internet companies or signing joint ventures with major telecommunications providers. A year ago, for example, a subsidiary of Potomac Electric Power Co., which serves Maryland and the District of Columbia, pledged to spend $150 million to develop long-distance, cable television and Internet services in partnership with RCN Corp., a major telecommunications provider.

There are other reasons some utilities turn to the Internet. Warren Dunn, director of communication for National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, said that at least 60 of the nation's 1,000 rural cooperatives offered Internet access, in part because they consider it part of their charter to serve their communities.

Marshall, the general manager of Plumas-Sierra, said the utility cooperative felt it had a responsibility to provide Internet access in a region others were ignoring.

Before the electric company started its Internet subsidiary in the fall of 1995, residents of the area had to place a long-distance call to get Internet access.

"We felt advanced technology would not be available unless we stepped up to do the job," Marshall said.

Related Site

Following are links to the external Web sites mentioned in this article. These sites are not part of The New York Times on the Web, and The Times has no control over their content or availability. When you have finished visiting any of these sites, you will be able to return to this page by clicking on your Web browser's "Back" button or icon until this page reappears.

Cyber Trails



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1799)8/4/1998 12:17:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 12823
 
Heck, why stop with utility companies? Let's bring in the army!
=================

Thai Army Proposes To Build TOT SDH Network

July 24, 1998

BANGKOK, THAILAND, Newsbytes via NewsEdge
Corporation : The Telephone Organisation of Thailand's
board chairman Mechai Viravaidya Wednesday
cautiously welcomed the army's proposal to install a
high-speed digital telephone network for TOT.

Mechai said he would like to talk informally with
representatives of the Army about the proposal before
carrying out formal negotiations.

The army is reportedly confident it could replace the six
companies chosen to install the synchronous digital
hierarchy (SDH) system.

"I am glad to see the news," said Mechai. "I would like
to see in detail the army's proposal ... However, so far we
could not tell how much we could save in hiring the
Army instead of the private firms."

Six companies earlier won bids to supply and install the
SDH system in six zones. However, following
accusations of bidding collusion, the TOT board asked
the TOT to buy the equipment on its own and hire the
six firms to merely install the system.

Mechai said he learnt one of the six companies might
withdraw from the project because it does not believe
the profit will be sufficient. "If the company withdraws,
the army may replace the company to install the system,
" Mechai said.

The board chairman said TOT will try to buy the SDH
equipment directly from a manufacturer. The TOT will
propose Thai ambassadors in various countries ask SDH
equipment manufacturers to submit bids.

Early Wednesday, Mechai attended a hearing of the
House committee on communications to explain the SDH
project.

Mechai said he was glad the House committee tried to
ensure TOT projects be transparent. He responded
harshly when confronted with allegations of bidding
collusion.

Democrat MP Thawee Kraikupti, who has been
campaigning against the project, asked Mechai to
explain why each of the six companies bid on the project
in one zone only.

"The fact that a company decided to bid in a particular
zone was because the company had its own reason. I
don't know how they would think because they are not
children of my parents," Mechai replied.

Chat Pattana MP Sunai Jullapongsathorn, deputy
chairman of the House committee, and other opposition
MPs, became angry at the question and began to argue
with Democrat MPs on the panel.

After the House committee resumed the hearing in the
afternoon, the quarrel intensified to the point that Sunai
proposed the removal of Democrat MP Mana
Mahasuweerachai as chairman of the House committee
for alleged bias during the hearing. However, New
Aspiration Party Samphan Lertnuwat moved the meeting
be closed before the vote.

In a related development, Democrat deputy spokesman
Noppadol Pattama said a party committee may conclude
its investigation into the feud between Thawee and
Communications Minister Suthep Thaugsuban over the
SDH project by this weekend.

Noppadol said the committee would listen to Suthep
Thursday and invite Thawee and Mechai to testify
Friday.

Reported By Newsbytes News Network:
newsbytes.com

(19980722/WIRES ASIA, TELECOM, GOVT/)

<<Newsbytes -- 07-22-98>>

[Copyright 1998, NewsBytes]



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1799)8/4/1998 12:24:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 12823
 
"Current" Affairs

By Rachael King, Public Network Editor
Rachael King is public network editor for tele.com.

In Manchester, U.K., a group of six-year-olds have no idea
they're participating in a milestone in the history of the electric
industry. They're surfing the Internet--over power lines, not
phone lines. The kids at Seymour Park Primary School are the
first users of technology developed by Northern Telecom Ltd.
and Norweb Communications, a division of United Utilities
PLC (London), that enables high-speed Internet access over
existing power lines.

Running data over power lines is nothing new, but the
challenge is to create an economical solution that can filter out
enough noise to deliver high-speed service. Nortel and
Norweb--a utility subsidiary that provides advanced voice and
data services to businesses in the U.K.--have invented a
scheme that stops the electrical noise that occurs on power
cables from interfering with communications signals. Because
the noise characteristics of power lines prevent this solution
from offering 99.99 percent availability, it can't guarantee
lifeline service, which means it isn't appropriate for local phone
service. So Norweb plans to offer this solution to its business
customers for second-line applications like Internet access.

The Nortel/Norweb solution works by turning the low-voltage
distribution segment--the part of the electric grid between the
customer and the local substation--into a LAN. In Europe,
each substation supports about 200 homes. To provide
Internet access, each substation would be linked by fiber optic
lines to a central switch that leads to the Internet. By placing a
base station next to the transformer at the substation, radio
frequencies can be injected onto the power network to each
home. At the home, a small device splits off the radio
frequencies from the electricity.

Currently, new coaxial cable wiring must be placed in the
home from the splitter to the PC. Theoretically, though,
existing power wiring could be used in the home if its quality
were high enough. While most in-house wiring can't
accommodate the system right now, a number of companies
are creating adapters that could make existing wiring usable.
Those companies include Intelogis Inc. (American Fork, Utah)
and Tut Systems Inc. (Pleasant Hill, Calif.). "Ideally, you
would like the power socket in the home to have an IP
address," says John Laycock, director of new enterprise
development for Nortel.

It may be a while before the technology makes its way across
the Atlantic to North America. In the U.S., the final drop from
the transformer to the customer premises is much shorter than
in Europe and Asia. In the States, one pole-mounted
transformer serves about 10 homes, rather than 200. That
makes the cost-per-subscriber for such service 20 times
higher.