SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Liteglow (LTGL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jason Riche who wrote (2774)8/4/1998 6:36:00 PM
From: AriKirA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4715
 
Jason,

That is our problem. He never responds!!

As to the increase in authorized shares, I understand the reasoning behind most of the earlier posts, however, the fact remains that the increase took place without a shareholder's meeting. I never received a proxy stating that there would be an increase proposal at said meeting. I am convinced that the latter never even took place.

In addition thereto, my e-mail requesting a copy of the resolution was ignored. I am not quite sure what the legal requirements are in the states, however I am quite confident that the increase was illegal.

I recently contacted a CVIA shareholder who led a shareholder class action suit against the company's directors. They proved that the CEO had released misleading and fraudulent press releases (kind of like what is going on here). The judge ruled that 2 shareholders be appointed to the Board of Directors. Since, the shareholders and their representatives have taken control of the BoD. As a result, they are helping the SEC investigate further into the matter. Thus, individual investors can make a difference by taking an initiative.

I am not suggesting that such action be taken with respect to LTGL. However, I would like to see some proof that said increase in shares legally took place. As a shareholder, I have that right.

Just hope I'm not the only one who shares this view.
AK