Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (403)	8/4/1998 3:06:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 13994

>>I have it right.You just want it your way.None of the pattern of behavior you talk about has anything to do with what this discussion is about and you know it.We are talking about the sexual behavior of the President. You couldn't be more wrong if you tried, not that you aren't trying. You are living in your own fantasy world which events in the next few months will completely shatter. Enjoy!

To: pezz who wrote (403)	8/4/1998 9:13:00 AM
From: Les H	Respond to of 13994

You're just a biased supporter of Clinton and his policies. Those are not just patterns of misbehavior. They constitute illegal conduct and abuse of power. I never demanded he be fired because he had sex with an intern in the Oval Office. He should be censured. By the way, there were a number of Congressman who were removed because they had sex with House pages. The other offenses in this case could be causes for impeachment. And his other activities in Travel Office, FBI Files, Healthcare Committee, and others deserve impeachment for abuse of power. No one is assuming he is guilty to start with. The physical evidence on the tapes, the contrary testimony by other witnesses, his pattern of purjury in the past put him at a disadvantage to more credible witnesses. He lies about as well as a teenager who wrecks the family car and tries to hide it. There are both people who voted for him and those voted against him and those voted for none of the above. Your last several statements just goes to show how large a part of the population is corrupt. > We the people hired him.We say we don't mind. We determine the >job.And we don't give a rat's pitute about what the hell you small >minded, self righteous ,consertives want. Actually, many companies have rules stipulating against using office facilities for sex. He would be fired. No company would be stupid to allow such misconduct to poison office morale and subvert other employee's expectations of fair treatment for promotions and career advancement. >If I own a large company and my CEO has sex with an employee and I >think he is doing a good job running the co.No law of the land says I >must fire him.I don't fire him and any minority share holders >that don't like it be dammed.

To: pezz who wrote (403)	8/4/1998 9:40:00 AM
From: Les H	Respond to of 13994

>You and your fellow right wing buddies are not going to >jam your agenda down the throats of the American people.Even your >Republican congressman have come to understand that. Actually, the left-wing Democrats have been trying to cram down their policies on the American people. They tried to cram down that ill-conceived Healthcare Reform without the required open debate and the full disclosure. Clinton tried to circumvent the laws regarding them. One only needs to read "It Takes A Village" and about her work in the LSC to realize who is trying to impose a dictatorial government. Or have you forgotten Ruby Ridge and Waco, Texas? After all, all the great Democratic Party's grand social schemes of the past fifty years, such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, and Urban Housing, have been found to be bankrupt or approaching bankruptcy. A review of the Federal budget indicates over 70% of the spending in the budget to be Democrat programs. It's time to return the money back to the people who work for a living. Perhaps, next time, you send your dad to argue for you.

To: pezz who wrote (403)	8/4/1998 10:01:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

<<As far as your demand that he be fired because he had sex with an underling.We the people hired him.We say we don't mind. We determine the job.And we don't give a rat's pitute about what the hell you small minded, self righteous ,consertives want.>> You couldn't be more wrong. We the people do not determine the job as it progresses. We elect representatives to pass legislation. We vote to ratify the constitution and its amendments. But we DON'T base the president's job duties on some kind of poll. We have not said "we don't mind", and it makes no difference if we did. If he broke the law, he'll be dealt with as a law breaker. We the people have implemented laws that must be abided by everyone including the president. Why is it so difficult for you to understand this principle?

To: pezz who wrote (403)	8/4/1998 10:10:00 AM
From: Peter S. Maroulis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Only a 'Sic-Suk' extreme 'Left Winger' would support a White House full of 'Slime Balls' and the most noted 'Scum Bag' in America today. What Gov't program are you on ? Clintoon is a real "Winner", has he no shame ?

To: pezz who wrote (403)	8/4/1998 10:46:00 AM
From: halfscot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

If I own a large company and my CEO has sex with an employee and I think he is doing a good job running the co.No law of the land says I must fire him If you run your own co. and take this stance, especially after you've spoken these words, you wouldn't have to worry about firing your CEO. Your company would be effectively taken away from you through all the lawsuits filed against you for protecting such a 'predator'. You would be the National Trial Lawyer's poster boy for their "How To Get Rich Quick" course in litigation strategy studies. halfscot