Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (3295)	8/4/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12810

I would say this is condescending +Rumpl4skin (3272 ) (Trial Member) From: +jhild Monday, Aug 3 1998 7:06PM ET Reply # of 3295 Are you applying for a position here? Or just pretending that you don't know what a palindrome is? ------------ and several people took it that way...if you meant it in a lighthearted way .....some people didnt take it that way and you are right the number isnt a palindrome but ripping someone in such a condescending way was unnecessary and from reading your post...it seems you didnt know there were palindrome NUMBERS until you did some research..but maybe I am misreading your words To: +Michelino (3278 ) From: +jhild Monday, Aug 3 1998 11:22PM ET Reply # of 3296 It seems that there are number palindromes