SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rob S. who wrote (12608)8/4/1998 11:48:00 PM
From: umbro  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
I'm not buying the idea that PlanetAll acquisition helps AMZN's VC liquidate.
Amazon's primary investor is Kleiner Perkings. Here are Plant All's investors, from their web page:
Investors
PlanetAll is privately held. ÿIts lead investors are CMG @Ventures, Lycos, Puma Technology, and @rts @lliance. ÿ CMG @Ventures invests in and integrates advanced Internet, interactive media and database management technologies. The firm and its affiliates have an interest in Lycos, Geocities, and numerous other internet properties. ÿ Lycos, one of the biggest destinations on the internet, made a substantial investment in PlanetAll in April, 1998. Puma Technology, the leader in Mobile Data Exchange(TM) software, has invested in PlanetAll as part of a partnership with PlanetAll for synchronization with a variety of software programs and handheld devices. ÿ@rts @lliance, Ltd. is a UK-based investment firm specializing in the internet.


Yes, CMG Ventures has made out like a bandit, but I don't see how KPC benefits. Am I missing something?

Rob S wrote --
Could it be because Amazon.com (Bezos family) and the VCs saw this as a way to make a large payment to the VC under the cover of an acquisition?



To: Rob S. who wrote (12608)8/4/1998 11:53:00 PM
From: TraderDad  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Rob, i agree. I believe that this deal is for the benefit of the VC's and that AMZN was "obliged" to do it. The VC's , particularly CMGI, get to bundle and unload inflated i-net companies that they've brought along. Amazon serves well as the host vessel. It is the strongest magnet for pulling in other people's money, and has been unparalleled as a mask for hyper-inflated valuations, of the whole or any of its' pieces. I just can't believe that Wall Street is so gullible (or is it complicit) to this pyramiding in all things internet.



To: Rob S. who wrote (12608)8/5/1998 6:52:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 

Glenn, I disagree about the complexity and usefulness of the site - I don't think it is
THAT cheap or easy to build such a site.


Rob,

You are correct. It could be produced for about $10 million is my guess.

What the heck, it's only a few hundred million of shareholders money. As long as the
VCs are happy with, investors should be happy - right? (snicker, snicker ; -)


I wonder if the long shareholders will ever wise up.

Glenn