Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GLOW - Global Games, Inc. - Great Profit Potential ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5912)	8/5/1998 10:34:00 AM
From: Robert Harris	Respond to of 8879

I WISH ALL OF YOU WOULD STOP BICKERING AND TRYING THIS "ONE UPMANSHIP" ON BASHING EACH OTHER AND START PUTTING MORE EFFORT ON REAL DD IN THIS STOCK! IF NOT TAKE IT SOMEPLACE ELSE! I THINK I'M NOT ALONE IN SAYING THAT I'M SICK OF IT! GIVE IT A REST! BOB HARRIS

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5912)	8/5/1998 10:51:00 AM
From: jjbucci	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8879

T.G.W. I disagree with your latest post to BigRedMan, I honestly believe that his presence here has had a major calming effect on the thread, I have found him to be fair and honest, and armed to refute the innuendo that has spewed forth here. I also cannot believe that you find him insulting. His replies to you have always been thoughtful, and he has not engaged in the usual name-calling so common on this thread and others. In fact he has gone out of his way to treat you with respect, respect that you did not return. This thread has the potential to become one of the finest on SI if we all (you and me included) can contain our emotions and discuss all aspects of this company as openly and honestly as possible. I have asked the other posters on this thread to back off on the personal attacks and I have asked you and MMpro to do the same. But We also expect an end to the innuendo, We all welcome facts that can be discussed and investigated. Innuendo cannot be refuted because it can be twisted and turned in so many ways that meaningful discussion is impossible. I am asking you again, to please stick to the facts, I and I'm sure all others on this thread welcome anyone with facts to discuss. As for Mr.Davis, All discussions of him should cease, they just tend to lend him an air credibility. He will have to live with what he has said and done. Finally, as to your quote that " I can assure you that when the dust settles, and the facts about this company are finally revealed, your name will be at the top of the list for censure and maybe more." We have all been eagerly awaiting GLOW's fully reporting status. I believe we all understand that some things, which may have been questionable, were probably done by the company before Gary took over. After all, why would a company change C.E.O.'s and other management if they were doing a good job ? If you have facts about any of the companies past doings, please post them or stop the innuendo !!!! If you do not post these facts (Your words, not mine) we will all assume that you do not have them. In which case we are back to the innuendo. jjbucci

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5912)	8/5/1998 11:02:00 AM
From: BigRedMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8879

T.G.W., Once again, I am really sorry for getting your dander up. That was not my intent. Someone sent me a PM that I found absolutely hilarious. He/she gave me permission to share it (however, he/she didn't give me permission reveal his/her identity). So I did. Again, I'm sorry you were so offended by it. Now, you said. . . The fact that SI gave you a one year subscription based on your insulting, pompous,condescending style. . . Actually, I think the reason SI gave me the membership is based on my incisive, clever, point-by-point responses. . . . borders on the incredulous. Uh. . .the term I'd use is FANTASTIC! You have added nothing to this forum except insults, smearing of peoples professional character, and clouding of the facts. I noticed that you accuse me of insulting others by insulting me. Isn't that somewhat hypocritical? I also noticed that you have yet, in your umpteen posts, to provide a single example of me "insulting", "smearing", "clouding the facts", or acting "pompous, condescending". I have called you many times on your habit of making sweeping generalizations without providing specific examples. I hope that SI removes your privileges for this ridiculous post. Why, on earth, would SI revoke my privileges for that post?!?! I thought it was a clever analogy! I busted a gut! History will show that your posts and those that support you will be responsible for many people losing a lot of money. I find it ironic that my puny little "insulting, pompous,condescending" posts that "have added nothing to this forum except insults, smearing of peoples professional character, and clouding of the facts" and have been read by the few visitors to this thread who have the patience to wade through my windiness would have more impact on investors' decisions than the posts and newsletter (which is advertised all over the internet and blasted out to 7,000 people) by Bob Davis who "has best of intentions, is a professional of the highest order (a no brainer observation if you read his newsletter), has an impeccable background." If people DO listen to me more than they listen to Bob Davis. . .well. . .then I'm better than even I thought I was!!! ;-) I can assure you that when the dust settles, and the facts about this company are finally revealed, your name will be at the top of the list for censure and maybe more. WAAAAAA HAAAAAAAA HAAAAA HAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!! I hope that you are in fact not being paid by ANYONE for posting on these forums. I WAS paid to post on these forums!! SI paid me by awarding me a $100 membership!! If you are...well you know the routine. Yes. . .I. . .I. . .I. . . know. . .the routine. . .I GET TO POST FOR ANOTHER YEAR!!! If I were Bob Davis I would immediately have filed a libelous law suit against you. But than maybe he is already doing so. But than again maybe not, since he is a gentleman, and does not waste his energy on fools. First of all, as I've told you before, you AREN'T Bob Davis. And, secondly, I proved beyond a shadow of a doubt what I said about Bob. Bob may be a gentleman, but that has NOTHING to do with him not filing lawsuits. Right now, Bob is running scared hoping no one sues HIM! Go back to my post. . .the one in which I used the "L" word (gosh, I hate that word. . .I only use it when necessary). Try to puncture a SINGLE hole in it. I know you won't. . .because you CAN'T! NO ONE CAN! It is irrefutable! You know it. . .Bob knows it. . .EVERYONE knows it! BTW, I'm STILL waiting on your response to my point-by-point discussion of the issues. I'd REALLY like to get back to discussing the merits of this stock! PLEASE! Answer that post! I beg of you! PLEEEEEAAAASSSSSSEEEEE! Your Year Long Buddy! GO BIG RED!!

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5912)	8/5/1998 11:49:00 AM
From: bRiAn	Respond to of 8879

another worthless post ......CLICK

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (5912)	8/5/1998 1:11:00 PM
From: Greg Hodges	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8879

T.G.W. I have just figured it out. your are a LIBERAL!!!!. It has been very interesting watching the Bob Davis Scandal here on the GLOW thread. What is great, and is a fact. Mr. Davis did jump to conclusions before he printed his statement. Everyone on this thread knows that (even you, but you won't admit it). Then everyone started talking about holding Bob Davis responsible for the stock going down. Now that is over guess what happens???? Who comes to the rescue for Mr. Davis the LIBERAL, because he is now twisting the story to make it look like everyone else on the thread is responsible. Need I say more. Greg Hodges