Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : General Magic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David who wrote (3339)	8/5/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: Frank Wechsler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10081

Thank you, David.

To: David who wrote (3339)	8/5/1998 4:23:00 PM
From: dwight martin	Respond to of 10081

Just as long as you('re not the judge, OK?).

To: David who wrote (3339)	8/5/1998 5:02:00 PM
From: Jane Hafker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10081

Look, whoever you are, I'm glad you like it here, and I brought up MOTOROLA for a very specific reason. In the early days there was very little reason for the existance of the company EXCEPT the name SONY and MOTOROLA on the basic name lists of involved and interested people. Also both companies took a severe and undeserved dive at the same time which had SERIOUS repercusions on this stock. They are still involved, I just want to know how, and as far as I 'm concerned ALL of it is beneficial to GMGC at this point. If you even begin to censure or restrict my discussing MOT in ANY WAY, take a flying leap, please. THanks. And I sure as heck you are not accusing me, mentioniung MOT, as "hyping a short position" or whatever it is going through your brain. Thanks. Enough it enough here, believe me. MOT may well be a good place to stash any long term cash, as all stodgey, conservative, old moldy blue-chip-only investors know, so I really don't think hyping it here is exactly going to make it rocket up to 100, and hyping MOT HERE, as you suggest persons unknown are cleverly invading this thread for the nice old blue chip, is about as dumb as going down to burger King to tell about the new $45.00 dinner special at an elite restaurant. There is no stock correlation possible, but there sure as heck is a lot of possible $$ correlations, and I'm very interested in hearing what someone finds on that detective outing. You're drawing stupid conclusions, my friend. And anyone I dragged into this by mentioning MOT that gets accused of being a co-conspirator, well, let's see how that sets with them. Or mentioned MOT on their own. For some reason this is irritating me no end. Sorry to all others.