To: silicon warrior who wrote (7536 ) 8/5/1998 9:30:00 PM From: Alejandro Respond to of 12468
SW: You have been saying that Bill R has refused offers. You have said it many times. You are like me in talking about the ARTT purchase. It has been pointed out to me that it was stock and not cash that bought the 15 % of ARTT. I have finally figured out that it is not a cash loss. OK. It was bought with paper. The investment, for now, isn't doing well. Your position on Bill is equally blinded as I was on ARTT buy. That is, there is no evidence that Bill R, and the Board, by the way, refused any offers. Unless you know for sure SW, how can you say with any degree of certainty, that WCII has refused offers. It's like the rumors of takeovers etc. Rumors. I have not seen anything that would lead me to believe the Board refused any offer. If they did, they must tell the shareholders. Well, maybe not. If an offer was so low that it was totally unacceptable, I'm not sure they would have to advise shareholders. However, the company making the offer, if it was a viable offer, has every right to tell us they made the offer and it was refused by WCII. We have not seen that. In a friendly manner, I think you are as off base on blaming Bill R as I am on the ARTT buy. I do think however, that I could give a better argument for my position on the ARTT buy than you can on Bill R refusing to be bought out. It seems to me that the new media separation was mentioned before. You say they should of done it in a good market. Maybe they are doing it in a good market. The telecom market. As opposed to 'the market'. Just some food for thought SW. I do wonder why you think Bill R controls everything. WADR ( I learned that today ) Ali