Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Geoff who wrote (4123)	8/6/1998 1:11:00 AM
From: dougjn	Respond to of 10852

Sounds a good plan. You are doing a wonderful and energetic job. I think you have prioritized wisely. Thanks, I'm sure from not only myself, but many. Doug

To: Geoff who wrote (4123)	8/6/1998 10:01:00 AM
From: Walt Bishoff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10852

What is the location of this page? It looks very interesting and timely. -Walt

To: Geoff who wrote (4123)	8/6/1998 10:36:00 AM
From: Sawtooth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10852

geoff: Your list looks very good. I think what is especially useful are those items that are not readily available to every investor at the touch of a key; for instance (and not inclusive or prioritized): research reports on Lor and the industry, the "excellent" (your call) SI/AOL posts you mentioned, the launch schedules, the analysis of risks in the sat industry, a brief look at Lor's competitors, Lor relationship w/G* and other partners/projects, links to GlobalStar and other partner web sites. I think Jeff's (?) idea of getting some financial support is very good and worth a try. Many people and groups have likely benefited from your efforts. Thanks, again. ...Tim

To: Geoff who wrote (4123)	8/6/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: dougjn	Respond to of 10852

Geoff - I would suggest that you not delete any of what is already there. Just indicate it is dated, and not being updated or corrected. And then have the new, slimmer stuff that you still want to do which you indicate you are still updating. Of course I perfectly understand how it is getting to be too much to update all that stuff you've got there. So don't. It's just that much of it is still valuable, so let your readers figure out at their own risk that which is no longer accurate. (E.g., I have found it useful to trace how Readware's projections have evolved over time, as Lor's assets have increased and more info. has become available.) No? Regards, Doug

To: Geoff who wrote (4123)	8/6/1998 1:15:00 PM
From: Rocket Scientist	Respond to of 10852

Geoff--I'm not a frequent poster, but I have really enjoyed and benefited from the Lor FAQ; For me, the best value of the FAQ is as an archive of the more trenchant posts by Readware, Valueman, et al, especially long term forecasts of earnings, market projections,etc, because as time goes on comparing the actual performance with the old forecasts becomes increasingly useful. Thanks for your great work on this project --RS

To: Geoff who wrote (4123)	8/6/1998 7:02:00 PM
From: JMD	Respond to of 10852

Geoff, first please accept my sincere thanks for all your hard work. Just terrific stuff. I think you've probably got this covered under one of your suggested categories, but if not here's a suggestion: one section should be pure analyst reports. I always go out of my way to get my hands on the damn things, read them, and then they get tossed, lost, etc. Then it's impossible to go back and read/evaluate who's making good and bad calls over time. Just think of the possibilities: an analyst's hall of fame, an analyst's hall of shame. Obviously don't do this unless other folks think it would be helpful, but I think it would be pretty neat. thanks again, mike doyle