SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe Bob who wrote (11945)8/6/1998 11:16:00 AM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18444
 
For you to take the time and think like that shows quite another picture, doesn't it?

I'm sorry Joe Bob, but I've been in this battle a very long time.

1) I owned Zulu at 17 1/2 cents going back last fall.
2) I lost a lot of money on TRGC.
3) I tried to play into the CAH/BBC pharmaceutical merger to get back the money I
lost in TRGC. I sold all my Zulu holdings.
4) While all my money was out of ZULU and into BBC, ZULU popped big time going as high as a buck and a half.
5) Frustrated from missing the boat, so to speak, with Zulu on its way up I bought back into one position at 7/8. I got two others near the $120 mark.
6) The Wired articles came out sinking the stock, based on what I considered shoddy journalism.
7) As Zulu came back down I averaged down in my positions to where I know hold nearly 12K averaged around the .60 mark.
8) I've seen too many outright lies, groundless accusations and distortions dating back to last fall.
9) I invested in the company because I believe in Zulu's proprietary technology, its capacity for sales, marketing and demographics and its bluechip clientele. This against a backdrop that new internet related stocks fare well.

I have every right--and very good reasons--to defend my investment. Am I emotional? Perhaps. I have been through a lot? Yes. Should you be giving me the leeway to think as I feel appropriate for me to do so? You be the judge!



To: Joe Bob who wrote (11945)8/6/1998 6:46:00 PM
From: Brady B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18444
 
Joe Bob. I too was emotionally attached to what's her name, ZULU. But she is about to be named corespondant in a divorce. Old bitch!
Wouldn't even give me time to go fishin'.

If she wants to seek reconciliation she will have to change her ways bigtime.

shhhhhh

bb



To: Joe Bob who wrote (11945)8/7/1998 2:06:00 AM
From: FlatTaxMan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18444
 
Joe Bob, in case you are unaware, Mister Jon Tara has been posting since mid-february non-stop negativity into this stock. He has been queried on numerous occasions as to his motives. He owns no stock. He stately that occasionaly he drops into a tread for educatinal reasons.
He seldoms adds any real DD at all. He attacks all news and sometimes makes some sense and sometimes is rediculous. Always trying to plant seeds of doubts. Watch his actions if there is any movement in the stock upward. He is a real pro IMHO. I do not know why anyone person would spend 6 months of his time on a stock he does not own. Looking at his personal profile you will see that he seldom post anywhere but Zulu. Sure seems like a personal vendata to me. He will probably critcize my poor spelling. He is also very quick to go running to the SI admin to try to get pro Zulu members off the board if he feels he is being personally attacked. Which does not take much to hear him whine. All just IMHO. Yes partytime is extremely pro Zulu but I believe it is a counter measure to someone who is totally on the other side. Hence a wierd sort of balance. I wish I had some of the time to keep up on the issues as some of these non-stock owners do for the benefit for all those poor souls who have invested their hard earned dollars into evil. Save us Jon.

FTM