SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marginmike who wrote (839)8/6/1998 11:51:00 AM
From: tero kuittinen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
Jim, that was fascinating. I think that even if there is a court battle the implementation of W-CDMA won't be stopped in the meanwhile. How often have there been major injunctions in IPR disputes like this?

mike, both Nokia and Ericsson have patents on W-CDMA, of course. Who said they didn't? I don't think you can just dismiss W-CDMA out of hand... very few people here seem to know much about it in the first place. It's very strongly endorsed by Japan and even if single Japanese companies don't always get their wish (Sony & Betamax) a standard endorsed both by Japanese government and the world's biggest cellular operator is nothing to scoff at.

Has everyone forgotten that Korean companies like Samsung have already jumped on W-CDMA bandwagon? This shows that even in a country where GSM has been outlawed W-CDMA has gained substantial support. How does that fit with the conception of W-CDMA as some sort of devious GSM ploy? When you combine the clout of ETSI, Ericsson, Nokia, Motorola (which accepted the Docomo invitation to join W-CDMA handset development unit), major European operators, Japanese government, all major Japanese mobile phone companies heavily investing in W-CDMA R&D, NTT-Docomo and Korean manufacturers you get a lot of momentum.

If you think that Qualcomm has no downside just wait a month. And the current sea change in global handset market shares has not been yet incorporated into Nokia's stock price. The next two quarters will show that. Wouldn't we all want to pick the next Microsoft, a small company that has room to grow by 1'000%. The sad truth is that the next Microsoft often turns out to be the next Netscape or Silicon Graphics. Remember when it looked like they would own the world by year 2000? It often makes more sense to invest in a company that has a solid shot at 30-40% profit growth in the long term. I have very little money to invest and if I want to gamble it I'll go to Atlantic City.

Tero



To: marginmike who wrote (839)8/6/1998 12:17:00 PM
From: Penny_Money  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
Marginmike relax

One of the rules of posting is no personal attacks.
< It removes any credibility you would have. >

Please stick to the facts and the company. Please do not pass judgements on individuals who post.

A request.

Penny