Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (7930)	8/6/1998 12:38:00 PM
From: Fred Thornell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11684

Janice what is this ??? {BAD GIRL} To: ColinD (2156 ) From: findstock Thursday, Aug 6 1998 10:54AM ET Reply # of 2162 To: Tastes Like Chicken (0 ) From: Janice Shell Wednesday, Aug 5 1998 7:39PM ET Reply # of 374 Okay Chickie, I'm getting in under the wire. And dammit I'm gonna LIVE MY DREAM of shorting BB stocks. But frankly your rules are unfair; PRWT was on my list, but...trading under ten cents. Short: EDII FAMH NBTY CYGS FNTN AHAAAAAAHHAAAAHHAAA! NO LONGS!! If I had to choose, well just for the hell if it I'd pick SEEK, NICEY, and LBOR. So there. BTW: if trading is suspended in a stock that you're short, is it fair to count its value as zero? But this is my chance to SHORT BBs, and so I will (I hope) love every minute of it. So isn't this special? I think also that it wasn't fair that you didn't let us do options; I really would have had AAAAHAHAAAAHHHHHaaa more fun with index stuff... Janice Janice I would like a response from you on THIS!!! as you and Kasha have called me out on this point that YOU DON'T SHORT BB STOCKS

To: Janice Shell who wrote (7930)	8/6/1998 12:50:00 PM
From: eric deaver	Respond to of 11684

<<Since at the time this statement was made no surveys had yet been done, it might be argued that they had no idea whether this was true or not. Was management misrepresenting the value of the company to shareholders and potential shareholders? That's part of what the SEC wants to know.>> Perhaps I misread your post. I read you comment at the end to mean that the SEC was investigating the fact that no surveys were done at the time of the PR. Which you would have to admit would be a IMOO statement. My mistake. Eric