Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Caussa Capital (formerly Antares) T.CAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bill718 who wrote (4053)	8/6/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: Alan Markoff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4718

Wayne; I do agree with what your position is in regards to Antares. I did call the Company this morning and requested an investment package.... They are on the Toronto Exchange and that in itself is a positive. Many mining Companies have been beaten down lately its no reflection with regards to the value of a company or the efficiency of Management. Summer months are generally not good for mining stocks anyway they tend to do better in the early fall and winter.

To: bill718 who wrote (4053)	8/6/1998 4:33:00 PM
From: Ray Fidler	Respond to of 4718

To All: I believe that john still has the right to voice his opinions in this thread and perhaps he will after he returns from his vacation. Antares is not preventing john from writing on this thread - only trying to stop his slanderous statements against Mr. Dennis Gray. What's so wrong about that? Freedom of speech is great, but not slanderous statements. Regards, Ray Fidler

To: bill718 who wrote (4053)	8/6/1998 4:46:00 PM
From: DogPaw	Respond to of 4718

Hi, I just spoke to IR today since you suggested that we phone IR for ourselves and they hung up on me when I questioned them for the reason for pursuing the matter against john. I am concerned about the potential problems with this action. I feel that it is a better tactic to be working harder to achieve results. They responded by saying that they didn't care about the consequences of their actions with respect to the shareholder. Does this mean that it is more important to protect their integrity and reputation than to protect the interests and the investment of the shareholders? Wow!! I can't believe what I heard, it appears that we have a very big problem with Antares!!!!