Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DIAMOND JIM who wrote (5973)	8/6/1998 2:51:00 PM
From: BWEEB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7966

Take a valium DJ. Ashton is right to defferr any more work on K91 until we know what kind of $ value k14 can produce. Aston cannot afford to wait until 1999 to have results on k14 so I expect to hear that they have finally achieved an agreement to process the sample elsewhere. (I seriously hope). I agree that Ashton's reporting IS and always HAS BEEN a disgrace. That's what Ashton's PR is for, so that investors can let management know how they feel!

To: DIAMOND JIM who wrote (5973)	8/6/1998 2:51:00 PM
From: JP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

<<The NRs are a disgrace with no real info re the many issues outstanding wrt to the plant, K14 bulk sample. A lack of info here is sending the message that ACA is turning it's back on Alberta. >> Could the Ashton parent company want the price to drop so that they can increase their interest in Ashton Canada? Anyone know the legalities of this sort of move? JP