Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Defrocked who wrote (6502)	8/6/1998 8:16:00 PM
From: goldsnow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10921

There's no cause for US optimism By Peter Hartcher, Asia-Pacific Editor "The world of high finance can be understood," wrote American economic thinker John Kenneth Galbraith, "only when it is recognised that the greatest admiration is accorded those who are paving the way for the greatest catastrophe." There is an unshakable optimism, so steady that it appears to be genetic in origin, among some of Wall Street's most admired strategists, such as Goldman Sachs' Mr Abby Cohen and Morgan Stanley's Mr Byron Wein. Their optimism is credited with exerting a stabilising influence on US stock prices after Tuesday's Asia-inspired sell-off. The basis of this fixed-grin approach to investment advice is twofold; it is to say that Asia's outlook is not as bad as you think, and that, hell, Asia isn't so important to the US economy anyway. Both propositions are flawed. The Asian crisis is probably only at half-time. There is a good deal more bad news yet to emerge from the stricken continent, particularly from its two biggest economies, Japan and China. Astonishingly, the general perception of China's economy is that it is still growing robustly and that the Government's target of 8 per cent expansion this year is plausible. Even if China's GDP statistics are compiled accurately, this is a seriously misleading indicator. There are still chunks of China where peasants are being brought out of the barter economy and into the money economy for the first time. The national accounts misrepresent this monetisation of the economy as growth in production. Other, more useful, proxies for activity in China show a significant slowing. The profits of listed Chinese companies have collapsed by about 90 per cent over the past two years. "China is slowing down significantly, and anyone that's telling you otherwise probably has some entrenched interest," says the chief treasury economist for Bankers Trust in Singapore, Mr Alistair Boyd. "Red-chip stocks [major Chinese firms listed in Hong Kong] have been getting slaughtered in the last three weeks. That tells you that the international markets are not comfortable about China's prospects. "And in the kerb market for dollars in China, the premium for dollars [over the local renminbi] has been widening. That tells you that the locals aren't comfortable with China's prospects either." As for Japan, it has not yet managed to put in place the prerequisites to reverse its downward spiral of deflation. The International Monetary Fund has pointed out that in modern economic history no country has managed an economic recovery with a dysfunctional banking system. Japan's Government has not yet even drawn up its banking bills, let alone tried to negotiate their passage through the parliament. And its plans to stimulate the economy remain just that. In the absence of drastic policy action, the yen continues to weaken and exert more downward pressure on other Asian currencies. This, in turn, worsens Japan's economic and banking crisis. For example, Nomura's Mr Richard Koo estimates with every 5 fall against the US dollar, banks are forced to cut credit by another 1 per cent of GDP. And what of the view that Asia doesn't matter so much to the US? "If I told you," says the chief economist for Chase Manhattan Bank in New York, Mr John Lipsky, "that the US would fall from 3 per cent growth this year to -2 per cent next year, would you say that would affect global growth? "Of course you would. Well, it's already happened - that's the scale of what has happened in Asia." You can't lightly dismiss the puncturing of the world's major growth zone of the first seven years of the 1990s. Unless, of course, you are paving the way for greater catastrophe. afr.com.au