SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CAWS - Wireless Cable (New and Improved) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FraudBuster who wrote (5531)8/7/1998 12:27:00 PM
From: FraudBuster  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5812
 
More of the same...

August 7, 1998

FCC Offers Plan for Competition
In Video Services, Internet
Access

By JOHN SIMONS
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

WASHINGTON -- The Federal Communications
Commission moved to spur competition in
video-services markets, agreeing to heighten
enforcement of rules requiring that cable operators offer
their programs to satellite-television services and other
rivals.

The FCC said the plan would help lower rates. Surveys
show cable rates rising at roughly seven times the rate of
inflation over the last year. The agency's jurisdiction over
cable prices is set to expire on March 31, 1999.

Thursday's proposal sets time limits for the FCC to
resolve programming-access disputes and charges of
pricing discrimination. But critics said it won't solve the
problem of rising cable rates.

"It's preposterous to suggest that this will do anything to
benefit cable consumers in the near future," said Gene
Kimmelman, co-director of Consumer Union's
Washington office. "It's disappointing that the FCC
refuses to do the one thing they have the power to do
that would directly benefit consumers: put a lid on cable
rates."

As expected, the FCC also introduced a plan to speed
the deployment of high-speed Internet services to
consumers. Under it, local telephone carriers could set
up a separate affiliate to roll out high-speed data
services, without the restrictions normally attached to the
use of those lines. Scott Cleland, an analyst with Legg
Mason Precursor Group, said the plan is "the first
investment-relevant regulatory victory the Bells have had
in two-and-a-half years. It's like asking a swimmer if
he'd like to swim without a cannonball under his arm,""
Mr. Cleland said.

But some long-distance companies, including AT&T
Corp. and MCI Communications Corp., complained it
would give the Bells an unfair advantage in the emerging
market. Rick Bailey, AT&T's vice president of
government affairs, said the company fears the
subsidiary arrangement "is not sufficient to prevent the
Bell companies from using their enormous monopoly
power ..." AT&T's proposed merger with
Tele-Communications Inc. would pit the combined
company against local Bell companies in offering
high-speed data services.

The agency also proposed rules that will allow U.S.
long-distance companies more flexibility in negotiating
phone-traffic transfer rates with foreign
telecommunications firms. The change would only apply
to countries where there is telecom competition-including
most of Europe, Latin America and Japan.

This is just more of the same thing that could have been for us had this "management" not run CAWS into the ground through their fraud and misrepresentation. Who knows, maybe "management" knew or had a strong inkling that these FCC actions were going to occur in the very near future and, knowing this, chose to file for bankruptcy protection and reap all of the future profit potential for themselves and Merrill Lynch.