Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Caussa Capital (formerly Antares) T.CAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bill718 who wrote (4072)	8/6/1998 6:17:00 PM
From: rhythm	Respond to of 4718

"The libelous statements can be retracted..." The "libel" has not been specified, so how could it be retracted? Antares supplied nothing more than a few post numbers. Surely not every word is libelous? I think you'll find that judges like to see things delineated a little more precisely than that. "...call the company..." ... Yes, wouldn't they love it if people thought that was full and complete due diligence. But there is so much more, and it seems to me that john was on to some of it. Otherwise they would have no need to feel so nervous. Anyway, back to lurking. I don't normally post. Good luck with your investments.

To: bill718 who wrote (4072)	8/6/1998 8:12:00 PM
From: Donald F. DeKold	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4718

Wayne, Gabe, Ray...what's your read on Bay Street Rat's latest? How many times has he missed? I can't think of any. Could be interesting! Don

To: bill718 who wrote (4072)	8/7/1998 2:19:00 AM
From: brian krause	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4718

Would you not think that if ANZ were to have a case that. John's statements would have to be proven to have had a negative effect. Judging by todays action without him I don't see a great improvement in market cap. If there is an increase tomorrow it could possibly be because of BSR's info. This is going to be a very hard case to prove and I would suggest that ANZ, although upset about having been the object of investors negativity, will be hard pressed to prove damages resulting from it.