Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : MIRANDOR-MIQ ON MONTREAL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Tate who wrote (2096)	8/6/1998 7:06:00 PM
From: Sailfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2635

Greetings Bob... You said... +++++++++++++++++++++++ K98-1 250 - 360 110 0.022 K98-2 295 - 430 135 0.018 K98-3 325 - 450 125 0.016 K98-4 370 - 385 15 0.052 K98-5 200 - 215 15 0.046 K98-5 565 - 625 60 0.031 K98-6 275 - 280 5 0.043 After reading last postings i tend to disagree these are bad results. Results simply confirm continuity of previously identified zone. ++++++++++++++++++++++++ Bob, you know that holes 1 - 3 are only marginally profitable for open-pit mining, depending on further drilling... Also, you know that holes 4 - 6 are for reporting purposes only... Unless you are privy to specific details regarding the current Kinross drilling program and the previous MIQ drilling program, including exact drilling locations along with azimuths, you cannot reasonably argue that "results simply confirm continuity of previously identified zone"... AND, I believe you know that... Regards....Ray