Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PINC - Planet City -- Software and Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chris O'Keefe who wrote (247)	8/6/1998 7:02:00 PM
From: RavenCrazy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1754

Chris - That USA Today article - which vendors of Y2K products did they mention? Thanks, Raven

To: Chris O'Keefe who wrote (247)	8/6/1998 7:12:00 PM
From: DavidCG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1754

Chris, Who cares if PINC wasn't one of ??FIVE?? y2k companies in that article... Are you aware that there are many, many more than 5 Y2K private and public companies out there in this world? For this you are disappointed? Somewhat dismayed? I bought PINC because , hey, its lower than $1 .. I knew people would be disappointed they didn't get their "news" handed to them on a silver platter on Friday of last week. So I get a bargain. If you know anything about OTC:BB stocks... 99.8% of the time news never comes out when they say it is going to... what a shocker. If you DON'T know this by now, you have no experience with OTC:BB stocks. Or you certainly aren't learning anything from past mistakes. I make more money from buying companies approximately 5 days after companies promise news... usually then daytraders have got disgusted and sold due to lack of patience.... Then the news hits and the spike up. Pretty predictable... try it sometime. Chris, you are allowed to be upset that news didn't come when expected... however you are NOT allowed to be upset that you didn't think this was a possibility. While I have the floor... I'd like people to look at SOST... Thanks.. -DavidCG

To: Chris O'Keefe who wrote (247)	8/6/1998 7:36:00 PM
From: Andrew H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1754

Chris, if you paid more attention to your tone, you might understand why some of us object to some of your statements. Here is one example: >>Don't you agree that they have handled that quite poorly? Telling people on the phone it would be this day, no this day, sorry next week, sorry please wait until September?<< You intentionally misstate the facts. No one ever said "wait until September," except you. The company has said next week. You have to expect people will not take kindly to you making up stories and distorting the facts in regard to a stock they own. Shame on you for making up such distortions. It would be extremely unusual for a new BB company to get a mention in USA Today, especially a Canadian company, but you try to make it seem like somehow the company is at fault. Here are a couple more examples of your offensive tone: >>But I wonder how many of these other companies have a web page with a "FAQ" button that actually works as opposed to Planet City's pathetic.." And it's so unbelievable anyway, that it's an affront to the intellect<< As I said in a previous post, the company is working on this and says they will have it done soon. IMO, there are far more important things than getting your FAQ's quickly in order for a small company with a small staff. If you choose to use loaded terms like "pathetic" and "affront to the intellect," over a small matter like FAQ's, then you should expect to get the kind of responses you have been getting and more. When you make a loaded criticism, expect a loaded answer.