Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sai P. yandamuri who wrote (651)	8/7/1998 1:31:00 AM
From: Dice	Respond to of 40688

Your concern is GREATLY appreciated. eom.

To: Sai P. yandamuri who wrote (651)	8/7/1998 2:31:00 AM
From: Bill on the Hill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

Sai P. yandamuri, Yes, all of the points you have stated are true. I thank you for your concern for my involvement and loss of money to this point. Until I sell I have not lost my money. If the stock is up, I do not make a profit until I sell. My risk, my loss. My risk, my gain. The other points you did not mention. 1. Great concept. In the internet sector, ideas seem to lead companies ahead. 2. Good associates. Companies as well as people are known by their associates. PNLK has chosen well. 3. Decisive management. The change to Rare Medium was made quickly and no further discussion was offered. I personally liked that. 4. Ahead of the competition. I have not found any other sites which offer what PNLK will offer at completion. 5. Responsiveness. Mr. Zagoren has been very helpful and has followed through on his offers to date. Naturally, these are all of course, IMHO only. I am an investor and what I hope that the management of PNLK does to stop the bloodbath is to take as much time as necessary and provide a workable, complete and cutting edge website that will provide its customers with access to the new paradigm which we are on the brink of. PATIENT STILL Bill on the Hill P. S. Does this make me a cheerleader?

To: Sai P. yandamuri who wrote (651)	8/7/1998 10:18:00 AM
From: Paganini	Respond to of 40688

>>GOOD INVESTORS who got SUCKED into<< Your statement almost boarders on saying that a number of investors here are either stupid or il-informed and if their in the later group then I guess the other would be true. From what I have read here on this thread everybody knows what they are doing. Everyone knows that this is a big risk. Everyone knows what the company is about. Everyone knows that the site is not complete yet. Everyone know that there are no numbers as of yet. Everyone knows that the stock price is dropping. Yet, after all that all the REMAINERS BELIEVES. There is nothing new that you can add "none factual" that has not been said. If you have somthing new of a factual natural then by all means do so. It gets rather tiresome hearing the same old thing from different people on a regular basis. If you have some new facts lets here them please! But if not... IMHO There are some willing to take the risk. We are all taking risk some moreso than others. ___ Pag

To: Sai P. yandamuri who wrote (651)	8/7/1998 10:58:00 AM
From: Seal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 40688

"Todate, PNLK's WEB site is not fully operational and nobody knows how many PAID SUBSCRIBERS they have so far and when will they start generating revenues etc. " You are correct in stating that "we do not need cheerleaders/unrealistic optimists but the ones who can post the FACTS about the progress of this company." Unfortunately, you do not appear to be one of those who can post facts, at least facts with any substance that have not already been mentioned, time and time again. Exactly how many legitimate posters on this thread do you think are not aware of the FACT that the website is not fully operational, the FACT that we are unaware of how many paid subscribers, yada, yada, yada. You know, it's amazing. Many people on this thread, including myself, have been referred to as a "cheerleader," which people like yourself find to be a derogatory comment. You people are a joke. I'm not saying that there have not been valuable insights given, but for the most part negativity about the stock is your main objective. How pitiful your lives must be to sit and spit venom on a daily basis. Here's a challenge for you to take up some of that time on your hands. Take a look at all the internet stocks that have escalated through the roof. Get back to the good people on this thread and state the FACTS as to how many of those companies have shown a profit. BTW, Sorry, but I'm keeping my shares. Your negativity and scare tactics are nothing new to this thread.