Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ddl who wrote (5997)	8/7/1998 9:45:00 AM
From: BWEEB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

Denis, I'm sorry but you have a very limited understanding of kimberlite. Your 3 scenario's are way off base. Core that is not kim. is not processed because it has 0% chance of containing diamonds. This would only dilute Ashtons results and would defeat the purpose of sampling the pipe. If k91 was not kimberlite and it contained diamonds then what is it? (it is kimberlite!). Denis, it is not uncommon to find different phases in a pipe that vary greatly in grade. One portion of a pipe may be barren while another part may be oozing with stones. It is not often that a pipes grades are even and consistent throughout the pipe! I will attempt to find a link for you to explain how this happens.