Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Post Grubbers Trophy Case -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jbIII who wrote (859)	8/7/1998 10:49:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7616

a clear violation unless a really good story is forthcoming

To: jbIII who wrote (859)	8/7/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: flickerful	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7616

grub this? #reply-5438802

To: jbIII who wrote (859)	8/7/1998 12:36:00 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7616

In defense of Randy, I think that 56895 might be a good grub. Though not a true palindrome, if you spin the number 180 degrees you will still have 56895. I think Randy might be taking grubbing to a new level. Henry, TED, I think we need another ruling here #reply-5436244 Grubbing an Ungrubbable number could be serious violation of the rules of Grubber etiquette. Penalties and restrictions may need to be invoked. I refer to Chapter 11, scene 2b or /2b, Acts 69 "Thou shalt not grub ungrubbable numbers" jb3