Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Rohner who wrote (5068)	8/7/1998 10:54:00 AM
From: Mike Gold	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Keep in mind that the huge placer deposits near this new area came from somewhere! By the way, you probably noticed that lack of calculation of the number of ounces in the deposits-this surely a result of the SEC investigation of Golden Eagle. That is what got GE in trouble. MDIN is trying to avoid the same thing from happening to them.

To: Don Rohner who wrote (5068)	8/7/1998 11:02:00 AM
From: Geoff Coates-Wynn	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 25548

"anomalous values in gold, copper, silver, zinc and molybdenum". Anomalous- differing from what would generally be expected. Generally, one would expect to find only the slightest trace of these materials in randomly selected dirt or rock. Anomalous values are a good thing. Sulphides are a good thing. Sulfides are associated with gold. True, they don't give any values for the first site, and that's frustrating. But they most certainly did not say that there was no mineable mineralization. Overall, this is a very preliminary report on these properties, which we have not heard any details about so far. It just confirms that there is the potential for the deposits to extend into these zones as well. That's my read, but I am not a geologist.