Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sedohr Nod who wrote (778)	8/7/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Fox News Fox News & CNBC August 6, 1998 Hannity & Colmes/ Over the last two nights several Clinton supporters have been engaging in "mental gymnastics" attempting to prove that Clinton can somehow deposit DNA onto Monica Lewinsky's clothing without actually having "sexual relations" with her. Foremost among these is a "former federal prosecutor" named Cynthia Aksney [spelling?] who has stated that the Jones case had a 3-part definition of "sexual relations," of which 2 parts were ruled out by the judge, including receiving oral sex. According to this logic, Clinton's receiving oral sex did not constitute "sexual relations" and therefore he was telling the truth when he denied a relationship with Lewinsky. And the Clintonestas smile and chuckle and pat each other on the back and say "Oh aren't we just the cleverest boys? He didn't lie because he doesn't consider a B.J. sex." Where will this lead? Flash forward 1 year. Prosecuter: " Mr. Jones did you kill Mr. Smith? Mr. Jones: "No sir." Prosecuter" "But you were on live national tv pulling the trigger 15 times and yelling die pig." Mr. Jones: "See, I believe the body is just a shell that holds the spirit. I believe you cannot kill the spirit. I also believe in reincarnation. Mr Smith is already back with us in a brand new body. So you see I don't believe I killed him so my previous statement is true. Jurry: "Can't argue with that logic. We find the defendant Innocent".