Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wildcat who wrote (33599)	8/7/1998 12:47:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Respond to of 35569

Wildcat, no apology is necessary. It stands as just another documentation of the absurdity by Jackson. Letting that guy into the "recovery" discussions of IPM is like putting a weasel in charge of a hen house. I don't care if he is right or wrong, smart or dumb, taking counsel from that egotist is just wrong considering his past involvement with shareholders on this thread. I would rather lose all my IPM investment than have him involved in any way, period. "Recovery" team take note!

To: Wildcat who wrote (33599)	8/7/1998 2:26:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Wildcat, suspicions were confirmed by his later post. He has the badge of connivance. His every post says do not listen to me. yet the group has made valuable gains via my input, that is why he wants it cut off. You be the judge of what he has added versus what I have added. Analysis and criticism are an integral part of true due diligence. More analysis and criticism might have saved many people many $. Do not forget this was a carefully crafted fraud with the main players on the board and a host of hidden extras who were also part of the script. Bill