Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : American International Industries Inc. OTC BB Symbol EDII -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (2211)	8/7/1998 12:44:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4814

WOW....not that's quite the run on sentence....and it didn't even complete the thought....try again.

To: jhild who wrote (2211)	8/7/1998 12:57:00 PM
From: ColinD	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4814

Jhild are you implying that Dror contacted every single accounting firm in US and no one would take the EDII account except BDO. If so I think you need to be very careful with statements like that. EDII would not take too kindly to that sort of slander. Your time is coming. ColinD

To: jhild who wrote (2211)	8/7/1998 1:55:00 PM
From: findstock	Respond to of 4814

\| Next \| Respond \| To: ColleenB (2209 ) From: jhild Friday, Aug 7 1998 12:39PM ET Reply # of 2224 I wonder why Danny is using BDO Seidman. It isn't because they are the only one that would work with him after Deloitte & Touche pulled out of his last venture because they required the addition of a statement to the financials that they could offer no assurances that the company could remain a going concern on the basis of it's financial condition? See my previous post as it pertains to the "negative light" situation without being negative...

To: jhild who wrote (2211)	8/7/1998 5:40:00 PM
From: Samgee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4814

<<<<I wonder why Danny is using BDO Seidman. It isn't because they are the only one that would work with him after Deloitte & Touche pulled out of his last venture because they required the addition of a statement to the financials that they could offer no assurances that the company could remain a going concern on the basis of it's financial condition?>>> This subject has been discussed before. I checked with MicroTel's (Dror's last venture) management. They stated that Deloitte did not resign the MicroTel account. Deloitte was asked to resign by the Board of MicroTel. MicroTel appointed BDO Seidman because Deloitte billing was excessive to be afforded by a company of MicroTel's size. BDO Seidman's fees were much more reasonable while the quality of their auditing was just as good as Deloitte's.