Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich_1 who wrote (51062)	8/7/1998 6:20:00 PM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Rich,great to see you're still here defending OVIS' inept management and the pumpers that got you where you are today. Keep up the good work..<lol>DD PS: have you donated any more of your hard earned money to purchase more shares for a quarter?

To: Rich_1 who wrote (51062)	8/7/1998 6:59:00 PM
From: bmart	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Mr. 1, Please recall that Mr. Mork hired "consultants" to work on his behalf on S.I.. I don't believe Mr. Mork was doing that because he felt the company "lied" to long shareholders. Mr.Randall Baker already admitted his "client" held a "position" in RMIL and Mr. Mork admitted that position was a short one. To claify; Posted by Riley G in: techstocks.com Fwd message from AOL: ------------------------------------- Date: 97-09-19 01:06:37 EDT You said: "No short seller can establish a profit on the short side without covering via a purchase. The only exception to this of course is if the shorted stock's company goes belly up. " BINGO!!! What do you think the shorts were betting on last year? After all, the company was losiing tons of money....the old CEO quit and stole a a cargo ship.......stole all the company's documention and accounting books...etc. IF THE MM OR OFFSHORE SHORTING GROUP DID NOT BET ON TOTAL COMPANY FAILURE THEY WOULD BE IDIOTS!!! Then when new management took over, since their naked short position was so immense, they decided to illegally short the stock. in order to prevent new management from turning the company around. Such was the case in January after the 1 for 30 reverse. Immediately after the split they shorted the hell out of the stock so that management had no opportunities to turn itself around through a Nasdaq or AMEX listing and higher price stability. Even when management announced that 9 month EPS was 8.5c back in May, the shorters allowed the stock to go above $.50 before the naked short campaign resumed from late May to early August as the stock went from $.60 to .16 during that period of time. COME ON!!! $.16 /share for a stock that had trailing 9 month EPS of $.085!!! Thats absurd!!! Come on TL the evidence is blinding you!! Especially after this past weakend's tactics of puting out that STRANGE bogus news release. Come on if after all this, you still think that there is no HUGE naked short position out there then you have lost my respect. Its obvious and staring you in the face TL! _____________________________ To: Riley G (10804 ) From: mawork1 Sep 30 1997 4:26PM EST Reply #10905 of 10908 Attention Cartel Members! You are sheep being led to slaughter. Certain of your founders are in the employ of stock promoters. The "big short position" is a rouse. The stock promoters want you to pull your shares out of the market so they can dump theirs. So far, Mike Zapara has sold off 200,000 shares and put nearly $500,000 in his pocket at your expense. You can call him directly and confirm. Phone number is 760-773-9227." -------------------------------------- mawork was said to be a couple of individuals, Dempsey Mork being one of them. Recall that Mr. Mork said he would settle the civil suit against RMIL for 200K shares, not the 100K he admits to being short. Also of note was the TA had an infamous past with GIFS. Certain individuals from the GIFS fiasco have made their presence known here on this thread. There is the matter of 144 shares (GIFS). Mr. Zapara , according to AZNT, after being hired to promote AZNT, saw how he could illegally obtain 144 shares. AZNT has frozen three of his accounts and cancelled all shares at the DTC. Yet we are to believe that the GIFS I.R. man was oblivious to the fraud being perpetuated at GIFS. ______________________ Riley, Guess what? We heard some real interesting stories that has been happening in the TA office...... 1. Dempsey Mork is very well known in the old TA office. 2. Dempsey Mork has been seen in the old TA office on more than one occasion and he was seen leaving the office VERY UPSET! 3. Somebody in the TA office, a high ranking officer, is very upset with the whole situation about OVIS. The same person hates Gary Morgan very much. (Could it be that this person is short also? hmmmm!) This person is Dempsey Mork's friend. 4. Somebody was told to handtype the certificates instead of printing them. (VERY INTERESTING). No wonder it takes forever for the last certificate to be typed processed. I guess if an officer of the old TA office is short, then he/she would try to slow down the process also. 5. THE NEW TA, American Stock Transfer, IS A VERY PROMINENT TRANSFER AGENT. They are like the MSFT, INTEL, in their business. No one can slow down the process now for the new TA is not siding with anybody and will not put up with any BS from a Market Maker. They are a well known and very prominent TRANSFER AGENT. Almost all the brokers I have asked knows the company in comparison to the old TA, where not everybody knows them or even heard their name _____________________________ The glue that binds all of these things together, is not these small BB companies individually, it is the group(s) of individuals who use these boards to manipulate these stocks. We can draw a correlation between Asensio's short picks and certain individuals who trade short on the larger boards. That is a perfectly legitimate position to hold. But when these same individuals, in groups, are attacking vulnerable BB companies which are illegal for small investors to short, we must ask ourselves whose interest is being served? RB

To: Rich_1 who wrote (51062)	8/8/1998 1:26:00 AM
From: Kurt N	Respond to of 55532

>>First, you sound like you are bitter that you felt compelled to sell before the halt.<< LOL. I think he would be joyous if he sold before the halt (IMO). If I had a chance to sell all of my remaining RMIL shares the day before the halt, in retrospect I would have. Such is life. Live and learn. >>I feel bitter too; but it's not with the company, but rather the short sellers.<< So you aren't upset that RMIL continually issued material false and misleading statements in Press Releases, which led to the trading halt and the current mess. Kurt