Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (35622)	8/7/1998 8:10:00 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 1576823

Re: "nice try, Elmer " Nice try John, but that wasn't my post. I did a cut and paste when replying to Stockmans post. He's the one who mentioned 333mhz systems and raised the 66mhz bus issue. I was merely responding. Those are not my statements. Re: "Unfortunately we were not talking about 333 MHz SystemS. The HP is the only 333 MHz system from a Tier 1 that I'm aware of. And in your original post to me, there is a BLANK LINE between your two independent statements." That's because one is a quote and the other is a response. There is a 'Re: " blah blah"' on the first and the second is my response. Read a little more carefully. The post I responded to clearly did involve a 333mhz system. Message 5435648 Is it possible that some were talking about 333mhz systems and some weren't? EP