SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ramsey Su who wrote (22691)8/8/1998 11:39:00 AM
From: TI2, TechInvestorToo  Respond to of 70976
 
Main frames and network servers (etc) also use these chips although the packaging may be different. Some years back when IBM went commercial with their DRAMS, they solved the problem of their unique chip layout by creating a package which compensated for their bonding pad layout.
TI2



To: Ramsey Su who wrote (22691)8/9/1998 10:28:00 AM
From: Katherine Derbyshire  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Part of the confusion is because DRAMs are manufactured in units of megabits (1 bit = 1 binary digit, or 1 physical cell), but PC memory is sold in units of megabytes (1 byte = 1 machine word = 8 bits for PCs). So, a PC with 32 megabytes of main memory (about standard these days) uses 256 megabits of DRAMs (= 16 16M chips, or 4 64M chips)

So, 32 million 64M units is enough to equip
32 million PCs at 8mbytes each
8 million PCs at 32Mbytes each
2 million PCs at 128Mbytes each

I recently did some PC shopping, and the "standard" seems to be 32megabytes or so. That's enough for the "average" user--business applications and the Internet--so most systems probably aren't upgraded.

I wasn't able to find good data re: the fraction of DRAMs used for PCs versus other applications. PCs are the largest single application, but I don't think they consume a majority of the chips. Especially as memory has gotten cheaper, non-PC devices have gotten "smarter".

Katherine