Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Cortex (Cor) [formerly CORX] -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RBlatch who wrote (477)	8/8/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: Cage Rattler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1255

RB: What sort of questions elicit their defensive reaction? Equity value has suffered over the last few months, support levels have broken, and you are dead on, there should be some feedback to those of us involved. When the stock holders become the enemy something is not kosher. If your read of arrogance is a correct, that is usually a sign you have asked the right/wrong questions and may be threatening. Not good! Ciao, Ted

To: RBlatch who wrote (477)	8/9/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: John Lacelle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1255

RBlatch, I am surprised that you think Cortex does not have good PR. In my opinion, they were overdoing it. There was a while when it seemed I got a letter from them every month about developments. Personally, I wish they would just save the money and work faster. You might consider calling or writing Robin, the IR person at Cortex. She replied to my E*mail promptly, and was very nice and infor- mative. As for the "arrogance" you felt, it may just be the normal Ph.D. sort of thing. Their top scientists came from the U.C. sys- tem and I can tell you that it is normal behavior as far as I can tell (I work in the U.C. system). I have met Gary Rodgers myself when he was here at U.C.S.B. and he seemed like a really decent guy. At any rate, lets hope for the best. -John