Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Patriot Scientific - PTSC -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cksla who wrote (5212)	8/8/1998 12:20:00 PM
From: Urlman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8581

I guess it would be APPROPRIATE for those who are newer to SI to DD posts dating back to July of 1997 IT WOULD BE VERY APPROPRIATE to read Benedict Arnold's dialogue techstocks.com Urlman

To: cksla who wrote (5212)	8/8/1998 1:36:00 PM
From: Dave Swanson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8581

Now we're Finnished.... sorry

To: cksla who wrote (5212)	8/8/1998 8:15:00 PM
From: bob	Respond to of 8581

bob, FWIW: I hear this company specializes in core licensing. I wish all would understand that it isn't easy breaking into the embedded markets. We have excellent technology that bottom line can't be beat price wise by ANYBODY. Any and all other chips in the 32-bit arena are at least 2 to 3 times the price and can't run java natively Let's see what happens when the .35 is ready. If you were building 1M smartphones and could save $10-15 per phone by using a PSC1000 instead of a strongARM which chip would you use assuming there was no trade-off in performance? Or how about 15M STB's?, or 2M Palm Pilots? The point is eventually someone will want to use the chip on a large scale, and as soon as one company takes the plunge, I believe many others will. They can't afford not to, it's just too expensive and that's the bottom line. Cap