Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Caussa Capital (formerly Antares) T.CAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gabe Heti who wrote (4135)	8/8/1998 2:11:00 PM
From: Cytotekk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4718

Clinton is slimey, not a good example of an American Citizen. He is more worried about personal pleasures than anything else, imo. If ANZ financials are so clear, then why are so many stockholders on this thread questioning the company disposition of it's assets? I would study the financials if I considered buying ANZ stock, at this point it may be a bargain. Problem is, I cannot invest in a company who lashes out at insignificant critics. It makes me wonder what is really going on. GM, IBM, ATT, DIS, etc, all have disaffected, angry, off base shareholders. Sometimes they disrupt shareholder meetings. They do not sue these unhappy shareholders, why?, because they know they are in the right and can answer all complaints competently. By attacking a lone shareholder, ANZ raises suspicions that perhaps he/she got too close to some ugly truths about the company. Gabe, I know you believe in this company and I have no personal complaints. I think they are misguided in their attack on a SI poster, no matter how much they do not like his opinions. I tried to tell them that the legal action was a misguided and costly action, they would not listen. Regards, Cytotekk.

To: Gabe Heti who wrote (4135)	8/8/1998 2:16:00 PM
From: Donald F. DeKold	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4718

Gabe, one of the observations I made regarding Antares annual report was that it was extraordinarily well-written and comprehensive. I don't what individual generated the language, selected the graphics content, or rendered the technical analysis...I'm sure a number of individuals...but I commend them collectively for the professionalism that went into this document. Perhaps the really offensive thing about this SI forum to the folks at Antares is the appallingly primitive level of written content that regularly appears hear to laud or decry their endeavors. Don :-)