Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (7604)	8/8/1998 3:32:00 PM
From: Bearcatbob	Respond to of 26850

So Eric. is that the basis of your accusation? I say if it is a true accusation that the perpetrators go to jail. If if it is not you go to Jill Jail for all time and be gone. Are ;you still/really short? Bob

To: E. Charters who wrote (7604)	8/8/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: peter matson	Respond to of 26850

I certainly hope they plan to prove up these results with further drilling and a larger bulk sample. {time will tell}. So you believe that these results are too good to be true and that is your main concern? Earlier you said they wont be able to mine it anyways so whats the diff. If management wanted to put together a real scam then they should have salted a pipe--maybe one of those uneconomic pipes cl25. This would have captured the imagination of many more investors - a high grade pipe--. Like I have said b4 if you have any proof we would all love to see it but condemning results just because they are good just does seem to be ethical. Regards

To: E. Charters who wrote (7604)	8/8/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: Mr Metals	Respond to of 26850

Yes, we had an advisor who committed suicide because he felt so guilty about Bre-X, but that's no big deal. We can hire investment advisors whenever we need to, and they come and go all the time. And finally don't even consider legal action. Your pockets aren't deep enough. Ours are. echelon.ca Have fun:-) Mr Metals

To: E. Charters who wrote (7604)	8/8/1998 6:14:00 PM
From: Mr Metals	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

brexcanact.com brexcanact.com Based on insider-trading reports, these same directors and senior officers (and some of their spouses) made over $165 million by selling shares of Bre-X and Bresea Resources Ltd. between May 10, 1993 and December 20, 1996. Who said CRIME doesn't pay.....LOL Mr Metals

To: E. Charters who wrote (7604)	8/8/1998 8:37:00 PM
From: HiStakes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Okay Eric, I can't believe I'm saying this, but you are beginning to grow on me. You remind me of my grandfather who was continually trying to convince people that the virgin Mary was not a virgin and other similar non-conformist points of view. He pretty much got the same response from others that you are getting - people were amazed with his ferocity of conviction and stunned with his flagrant statements , discussed his theories with contempt and anger - yet these same people continued to come back for more. So I've come back for more; if I may, let me ask you this (before I sell my shares at the double): 1. If "3 diamonds of this size do not occur in 200 ton samples. so far on the planet" and this is a "scam", you are also saying both that this is a scam and that these people don't know how to run a scam. It would seem to me that if this was a scam, the so-called "results" would be more within the realm of reality with ever increasing/escalating news releases. 2. What would constitute 'proof' - what do we ask for and what answers should we be satisfied with? Thanks, I think.

To: E. Charters who wrote (7604)	8/9/1998 12:12:00 AM
From: Walt	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26850

EC I have a few problems with your logic here. a. What is a representative sample. A company drills some holes and hits a kimberlite dyke so they analyze the core and report the results. So many feet of kimberlite core, it weighs so many pounds and then they recover so many diamonds. The results look good so they take a 200 ton bulk sample and analize it and report the results. Thats the way its done. Certainly one grab sample doesnt make a representative sample for a deposit, nor does one drill hole or a dozen nor does a bulk sample each is a step along the way but how else is one to do it. B. Ok we have a flat lying dyke that has been tested with a few holes and bulk sampled. It seems to have a certain thickness on average and a certain dip and has been tested in several spots. You say it probably isn't mineable. What thickness do you recon is the cut off thickness to mine and what dip would you need. Im not saying this is a mine yet but I'm sure not going to say it cann't be mined either. C. Now this is a tricky one. An independent test of reported results. When should this happen. And if a company wants to keep some info to themselves are they obliged to reveal it to everyone. Diamond exploration is a secretive buisness. WSP and ABER are partners in this and while WSP is the operator Aber has input and has seen the results so you are accusing them of slopiness as well. As you know companies still exploring a large area and areas which are still open ground like to keep certain results or tests confidential to have an edge over the competition. So maybe all publicly trading companies should have to report this and have independent tests of results but that would have to take a change in the way things are done. "3 diamonds of this size do not occur in 200 ton samples.. so far on the planet it is a first... make them prove it.." Lets just say I walked up to a rick kimberlite fissure system in south africa and took a ten pound sample and found one huge stone are you going to say that is impossible. I recall reading about a fissure system which had a pocket of daimonds in the kimberlite which made the rock worth thousands of dollars a ton. If WSP took another 200 ton sample and it had 4 diamonds and graded higher what then, if it graded lower what then. Either way neither proves or disproves the first 200 ton assay. You have a dyke with good results so the company does more work. I had a gold property once and it had a vein which ran good values so I went back and sampled it some more. In all I had ten assays ranging from .25 to 1.1 oz per ton. When I averaged them all out the vein ran .65 .. I took someone on a property tour they took one sample which ran only .22 Does this mean I was lying, salting etc. If the assay had of come back 2.2 what would that have ment. How should companies be obliged to report results and what checks should be run, before me I have the OSCs "Setting New Standards" report which is suppose to answer those questions in wake of Brex but I havent had time to read it yet but they say they are looking for imput so maybe you should suggest it to them. You raise some interesting points, I dont have the answers but WSP is one of a handfull of companies up here searching so Im sure going to follow the play because I'm also picking up tips of what to prospect for. I sure wouldn't mind finding a dyke like theirs on my ground. It would be great to have a combination gold and diamond mine...it would be a first but it could happen if a kimberlite came up through a gold ore body. regards Walt

To: E. Charters who wrote (7604)	8/9/1998 8:43:00 AM
From: Mr Metals	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Do you know anything about this E? You might not have heard about this New Security Hole in Windows 95, 98 & NT. So we are simply sending you this message to make you aware of the problem. This is a one time message. There's no need to be removed because you will not receive any other messages. Please do not be offended by this message it is being sent to inform you on Microsoft's Windows Major Security Hole. And may save your computer from being hacked. This New Security Hole will allow anyone to go directly into your computers hard drive and download, delete or view every file on your computer! This is not a joke nor a hoax, this is a fact! It is one simple windows command that allows this to happen, which is covered on our website. When someone is in your computer you can't even tell they're there. This effects everyone around the globe that uses Microsoft Windows 95, 98 or NT! Microsoft is ignoring this problem we have contacted them on several occassions, and they refuse to deal with this problem because it is so large. This is the same Security Hole that was mentioned on NBC, CNNFN, NewsBytes and other media sources. We are the ones that discovered this security hole and brought it to the attention of the media. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding this problem. But since Microsoft refuses to address this problem to all of it's users, we have taken it upon ourselves to do so. We hope you appreciated this message. If you would like to keep your hard drive private and keep other people off your computer system and receive the latest news surrounding this New Major Security Hole visit our website @: hackerproof98.com ( CLICK HERE ) Please Forward This Message To Your On-Line Friends or Any Media Sources so everyone can be forewarned. Remember, to be part of the Internet Community you have to participate in it. :-) Mr Metals