Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andeveron who wrote (709)	8/8/1998 6:31:00 PM
From: Paganini	Respond to of 40688

Pay Andeveron no mine! For he is one of my former patience. He has refused to complete his therpy, and as you can see is suffering in the worst way. Folks only when he comes to grip with this illiness will his suffering stop. Do not be upset with him for he knows not what he says. Andeveron is to be pittied. He suffers from that same afliction as Sai, only his is worst. He may be at the point of no return (beyond help. Andeveron, I won't give up on you Bud, I want to try to help you. You've been hurt I can see it, I can feel your pain. Call my secretary next month and setup an appointment her name is Helen Waite. ps: hey I'm here for you Bud!! I want to help you!! ___ Pag

To: Andeveron who wrote (709)	8/8/1998 7:35:00 PM
From: john mock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

Amen. I only hope that phase 2, if and when it does finally come out will get this dog back to 2$ per share so i can unload this sick, sick, puppy. p.s. Pag, please repost in English.

To: Andeveron who wrote (709)	8/8/1998 9:44:00 PM
From: Warren A. Wilbur, Jr.	Respond to of 40688

Andyveron: you make me PUKE . When I talked about slime I forgot to mention what Stockmans article has, the fact that they come in GROUPS (Andyveron and John Mock, this time). Andy, what a sorry excuse for a human being you are ! Do you feel smart ? is it an ego boost for your low self esteem ? A NORMAL person does not find the need to go to a thread and rub it in we all know the stock is down we don't need your help. the one who might need your help is your Buddy Sai. Spare us your comments and get lost, post on threads you are INVESTED in if you have any investments at all (No, I am NOT interested to hear about your investments, you can discuss it with Sai and the rest of your twisted mind friends, )

To: Andeveron who wrote (709)	8/9/1998 9:30:00 AM
From: john mock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

Andy, Please re-post # 709 often. It was one of the few truthful posts on this sorry thread. Some can't grasp why more and more people are fed up with the performance of pnlk but sooner or later even a wilber will see the light. Dr's pag & wilber, If you are going to treat all who think pnlk is a dog you will need lots of additional help. At least learn to spell PATIENT. What are they teaching in medical school these day's ?

To: Andeveron who wrote (709)	8/9/1998 12:51:00 PM
From: xyz	Respond to of 40688

" PNLK has a flawed business model, a flawed web site and lacks potential." Can you please explain how you are so certain of the above statement? I find it unlikely that the people who are involved with the creation of this business are so ignorant of how to do it right. Clearly you have (relatively speaking) no experience in this business when compared to JPC, GZ, Unz and CO. etc. These groups have been working in their respective areas for longer than you have been alive. Obviously that doesn't guarantee you are wrong, it just seems so improbable that you can so clearly see what the PNLK group cannot see. Have you pointed out the major flaws you have discovered to PNLK et. al.? I think they would be interested in knowing they are doomed if they don't change course ASAP. I am sincerely interested in your comments.

To: Andeveron who wrote (709)	8/9/1998 7:06:00 PM
From: Sai P. yandamuri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

Andeveron, I agree with you 100% but unfortunately the cheerleaders on this thread are so blindsighted and their illness can not be cured.

To: Andeveron who wrote (709)	8/9/1998 10:20:00 PM
From: Bill on the Hill	Respond to of 40688

Andeveron, OK Hows this. IT IS MY STOCK CERTIFICATES. (WHICH WILL SOON MEET .01 PAR VALUE OR WILL SOON RISE IN VALUE BECAUSE PNLK AS A COMPANY WILL PROVE TO ALL HOW THE WORLD WIDE WEB WILL BE PROFITABLE FOR THEM.) Listen you all, I don't want to spar with you. Fact is it is my money and if I lose it I will not blame Paganini, Wilbur or anyone else. If this company comes through with a home run I will not be rubbing it in anyone's face. I really do not like to lose money. I do like the thrill of the chase. I wonder why this thread deteriorates into the name calling and the "I know what is going to happen club." None of us has that kind of sight and if we did we would all be buying into the next DELL or YAHOO instead of wasting time trying to tell others what is going to happen to a $1 stock. I have read much good information posted by many participants on this thread both for and against PNLK. A lot of this information has been posted by you. You have stated many times that PNLK has a flawed website,a poor business model and lacks potential. In my opinion you are not correct. The website is in beta and to finish it takes time. Changing to another developer is a subject that I am not qualified to comment on but I like the way the company just did it. As far as potential I look at it and see many possibilities for making money, from advertising to the yearly cost and even to referrals. I don't see pie in the sky and if this stock hits $4-$5 I will probably take some profit out. I bought my second round with profit from the first spike in price. I am in this for free right now. I will hold half of my shares for long term and look for more stocks to take positions in. None of this matters to you so I ask. Why do you post if this is such a stinker? Why do you waste your time with folks such as us?