Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: H James Morris who wrote (12998)	8/9/1998 2:50:00 PM
From: Mark Fowler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

What do I know? I didn't think the 'Thing' would go from 40 to 147 either. << I can wait with anticipation to see your response when it goes from 147 to 300. ;-)

To: H James Morris who wrote (12998)	8/9/1998 6:52:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Respond to of 164684

Are you suggesting that we have to watch this 'Thing' for 5 years? Glen, can you take another 5 years? I just don't see the controllers holding the 'Thing' that long. What do I know? I didn't think the 'Thing' would go from 40 to 147 either. H, James, I would play this for another five years if necessary but would hate having to do that. I am not hoping a slowing in revenue would be a hint the controllers should leave. I never expected this junk stock to get anywhere near where it is either. I would have thought the recent acquisitions which are contrary to management's recent comments would have permitted this to fall apart. The PR is so good and the analysts keep plugging away. I really believe if an analyst is off by a reduculous amount in their projection of a comapany's future, they should be held a bit accountable. Small errors are expected and cannot be helped. However, making three year out projections on a firm that continues to increase losses should be obvious as a scam and the analysts should know better. Oh well.... Glenn