Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (864)	8/9/1998 1:24:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

No charge of harassment or wrongful termination by Willey, just charges of a predator (her "friend" Bubba) trying to take advantage of her in her most vulnerable moments. We've heard a lot of liberal clap trap about what Tripp allegedly did to her friend Lewinsky (Lewinsky asked her to commit perjury). Where's the hue and cry for Bubba's action? What can be more despicable than what she has recounted? BTW, if Mr. Bubba has had no relations with "that woman" why has he not come out and denied that the dirty dress will tie him in? Why has he not volunteered blood or hair samples? VClinton could shut down the whole Starr investigation into his "sex life" by providing reasonable explanations for his behavior. He hasn't because he can't and he's taking his office and the country down with him to save his own little ass. End of story. The truth will come out. JLA

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (864)	8/9/1998 1:36:00 PM
From: Les H	Respond to of 13994

Monica and Genifer Flowers both got jobs out of it, as were several others on Clinton's bimbo watch, There were also charges of intimidation of witnesses in Tripp's, Willey, Brown, and others. I don't see anything proper in using government employees, such as Jordan, Richardson, Pres. secretary, in providing jobs for sexual performance and for retrieving gifts and letters for witness tampering. If people are given jobs or promotions for improper office conduct, the result on office performance is not much different from the stituation where people are denied promotions for declining sex. Packwood's situation hadn't reached a trial either. Those would also be considered allegations and not proven. Using business resources for sexual harrassment, liasons, witness tampering, obstruction of investigations, etc. are all at least improper and grounds for dismissal and most of these would grounds for legal charges.