To: Henry Niman who wrote (24308 ) 8/9/1998 8:03:00 PM From: Machaon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
<< They have a 1 year target of $25 and a two year target of $40. >> Henry, now you are in real trouble! You are not supposed to say anything good about the LGND investment, even if it is true. Nevertheless, it was an interesting article, and I enjoyed having some positive news, for a change, after experiencing the negative price trend lately. I wonder why educated investors relish negative posts about the LGND stock, but don't want any discussion, of any substance, on why LGND may be a bad investment? I keep hearing comments about a balanced thread. But, a thread is not balanced if, on the positive side, there is a lot of data collection and research, and on the negative side, there are mostly personal attacks by stalkers. Do negative attacks by compulsive individuals really balance a thread? I think not. Re: The 8000 shares traded at $10.25 Even though the 8000 shares, traded at the end of the day at $10.25, only represented about 1.3% of Friday's trading, it was still an odd event. I guess we'll have to wait until tomorrow to see if there is an upward bias to the trading. Hmmmmm!? Re: balancing the thread..... How about an open invitation to anyone who thinks that LGND is a bad investment to state it on the thread, without any fear of personal confrontation? I'd really look forward to an open debate, with those who are negative on LGND being gracious enough to offer their evaluation of LGND to the rest of us. We've had to suffer through months of naysayers knocking LGND without giving any reasons, except for Richard Harmon, who really had some interesting thoughts against LGND as an investment. Regards, Bob