Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (35726)	8/9/1998 10:54:00 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 1571167

Re: "Damages due to Paul "running an investment firm" seems maybe a bit of a stretch...particularly since he's denied on this thread even having to work" Maybe Paul is his own sole client. EP

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (35726)	8/9/1998 11:28:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Respond to of 1571167

It might have been a fully funded lawsuit, to harass and badger. Paul hardly needs the money and would find it hard to prove he works as stated in the face of denials here, let alone defending $25K lost earnings. I think that sending 25,000 e-mails deserves some kind of hit on the skull with a ball peen hammer though, and Paul may have tried to reason with him and the guy persisted and then Paul got the hammer out. Smarts, I suspect, does the guy still have a job? I suspect he will not do that again from a known point of origin. Look for some kind of phantom attack Paul?? Bill