SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nathan50 who wrote (3565)8/10/1998 12:01:00 AM
From: JRH  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21876
 
Who would've thought lucky LU could dive from 108 and change to 86 in a few days?

I would've!! After watching it run _UP_ from 86 to 108 in a few days, it surely could do the same in the reverse direction!

Time will tell and hopefully lighter wallets will teach the ignorant a painful lesson.

My wallet is lighter because my cash is going into hi qual stocks like this one! ;o) Bro, there is no reason to get all spasmatic on the thread! Lets try to formulate calm, educated arguments instead of releasing bursts of anger.

Happy investing (are you shorting LU??)

JRH



To: Nathan50 who wrote (3565)8/10/1998 1:17:00 AM
From: ed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21876
 
Ha, you show your arrogance on this thread again but no wisdom.Maybe, you just
don't have any.
Pal is correct, because you sound like a female but with a male ____.

I bet if Ralph said on nightline that tomorrow will be the end of the stock market, but,
if you have the courage to jump from the SF bridge, you will survive, I guess you will
be the first one to jump. Because you have no brain and do not have the ability to analyze, but blind trust.If those analysts are so smart and can tell the future, , well
they can all retire , and there won't be any analysts. It because fools like you to make their prediction attractive.

Again, you offered no clues to persuade people why LU is overvalued Again with your simple mind , and no explanation why a PE of 64 for LU is overvalued. That is the reason I emphasized over and over again that you are a female but no brain. You do
not know how to analyze, and just do not have that kind of capability, but repeat over and over again what other said, most of the time the analysts.

Finally, you sound like you are the CEO of both CSCO, and LU by saying on the thread that China and India will not offer the growth. Well probably you know something the CEO of CSCO and LU did not know !!!! Ha! Ha!, you try to show
your arrogance again, but quite on the contrary, you only showed your foolishness ,
and IQ of >>> ?

Again, IF YOU DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING, then pls do not post on this thread.