Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bryon Bothun who wrote (7905)	8/11/1998 1:44:00 AM
From: David Wise	Respond to of 10479

This from the SEC: "The scheme, which involved the abuse of Form S-8, included bribes paid to newsletter writers to promote and disseminate misleading information about the company over the Internet. " OK, this one was over the Internet. Next one might be in a news magazine.

To: Bryon Bothun who wrote (7905)	8/11/1998 2:04:00 AM
From: David Wise	Respond to of 10479

This, too, from the SEC: "In addition, the SEC has increased its use of trading suspensions to minimize investor harm by intervening early in ongoing market manipulations when there is misinformation about the issuer in the market. " Different issue, but comes from text that discusses reasons for many new rules and delistings. It could be that Mr.Edwards could not meet the new protection rules, so didn't file to keep registration. Seems unethical, anyway, to be writing a story in baron's about a company when you are not impartial. For those who say we should leave him innocent until proven guilty, tell me if this is how he handled Par Chadha? In fact, since his defamation article, there is more evidence that Mr. Edwards is in trouble with the SEC, while nothing has surfaced about Osicom. Bryon, this came from a linked article in your post. Thanks!