Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : IAPI - The TV Terminator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockJock-e who wrote (251)	8/10/1998 9:10:00 PM
From: Bobb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 417

Is GMT Legit? I tried reading their track record, but like most stock promoters they manage to list the highs, not the current price. How does GMT make money. Are they paid by the company to promote it? Do they have much of following. In other words, will their support translate into a higher price. I forget to end my sentences with question marks, don't I. Bobb.

To: StockJock-e who wrote (251)	8/10/1998 10:31:00 PM
From: Scott H. Davis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 417

The report sounds good, until you realize there is no substantiation for any of the claims <<Lean Organizational Structure: The consolidated management structure of IAPI will bring about greater efficiency and a clearer focus on direction>> What is the structure & how does it play into this claim? <<The unique features of the TVT and the BSR provide differentiating abilities that no other product can claim. IAPI intends to open up as many revenue streams as possible with each new product. The catalogue of accessories will provide residual income not available to any other manufacturer.>>> OK, what features, how do they compare, what other revenue streams, what catalogue of accessories? <<US Patent and Canadian Patent Pending: Design patents will protect the TVT and future models from competition and bring about strong brand...>>> What patents? What technology is protected? Note: I'm not saying that any of the above is false. But does this "report" presume readers have read these details in previous reports? Without providing ANY details, this comes across as prime time hype. Maybe good for a short term pop, maybe a preface to a pump & dump, but I don't see this report as a long term positive aid, unless, again, the details to substantiate the claims were in an earlier report. StockJock-e, do you have a copy of any previous reports with details? Curious, Scott