Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : FLAME THREAD - Post all obnoxious/derogatory comments here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Voyles who wrote (5484)	8/10/1998 7:11:00 PM
From: GM	Respond to of 12754

taxi cannot vouch for ya... remember it takes 1 2 know 1.

To: Larry Voyles who wrote (5484)	8/10/1998 8:14:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12754

Certainly I can, dear. You're a total @sshole. Better now?

To: Larry Voyles who wrote (5484)	8/10/1998 10:06:00 PM
From: BamaReb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12754

Hey Voyles.......I vouch for ya. Your not an ass "hole". In fact, look what I found. A nice color shot of your full profile. BTW, whats that stench rolling over the Bama-Georgia line? It comin from your side..... alliance.rotten.com

To: Larry Voyles who wrote (5484)	8/10/1998 10:21:00 PM
From: Blue On Black	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12754

Larry, I am amazed that she left you unflamed after that opening. I can only offer three possible explanations. 1) Her awareness of ching-hsing (pure nature) prompted her to bypass your easy opening with its debt of karma and accepted 'suchness' as is and attempt to a state of prajna. Existing in 'suchness', she decided to exercise shih-hsing (realizing nature) and exist in harmony and contentment in hui-neng (self-being/being-in-itself). 2)She realized that true flames start at the weakest point. The various openings that you offered 'vapor-locked' her and she couldn't decide on which of the weakest points to begin. 3)She was REAL busy at the time. lee(the hick) PS...Amazing what the spell checker thought of this post.

To: Larry Voyles who wrote (5484)	8/11/1998 1:01:00 AM
From: Mitch Blevins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12754

Whenever I have a few hours to kill, I click on lisa's profile.... -Mitch BTW - In case you still need vouchers, I can verify that you are a complete @sshole. I also have a list of people as thick as a phone book that would say you are an @sshole. Well... okay... it is the phone book.

To: Larry Voyles who wrote (5484)	8/11/1998 9:12:00 AM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12754

Larry: You'll have to look else where for confimation of your @sshole status. As usual you are behind on your dues in the the National Society of Professional @ssholes. Of course you're still a common @sshole, one without professional credentials. This is formal notification that you are no longer a registered @sshole. This is a stigma and you may be shunned. Lisa I'm sure had this figured out long ago. By the looks of your most recent photo, kindly brought to our attention by a fellow @sshole in good standing, the new medication isn't working. Too bad. Foxy