SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (35764)8/10/1998 4:46:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson  Respond to of 1572746
 
Kevin, What evil lurks in the heart of man, Paul refers to epochal events on Aug 24. What can it be? Free celerons?, mendocinos with a bounty?, that will surely get the share up.

Bill



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (35764)8/10/1998 5:13:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1572746
 
Kevin - Re: "Were all those hundreds of millions spent on "Intel Inside" ads worth it?"

You bet - that's why Intel is very, very profitable and AMD keeps losing millions of dollars.

Paul



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (35764)8/10/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 1572746
 
Re: "THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT INTEL NO LONGER ENJOYS THE (VERY PROFITABLE) LEADERSHIP POSITION IT ONCE DID."

It still enjoys all the profits...

EP



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (35764)8/10/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: Maxwell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572746
 
<<< "66% WON'T CONSIDER AMD.">>>

Last year, 95% WON'T CONSIDER AMD.
Now, "66% WON'T CONSIDER AMD."
By year end, 50% WON'T CONSIDER AMD.
By next year end, 30% WON'T CONSIDER AMD.
By next next year end, 20% WON'T CONSIDER AMD.
....
....
In the future, NOBODY GIVES A DAMN ABOUT INTEL!

Maxwell


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News