SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. Charters who wrote (12177)8/10/1998 4:48:00 PM
From: ALAN DUBE  Respond to of 34075
 
I was looking around the Mine forum on Ragingbull.com and came across this little nugget <gg> Any comments

Al

<< By: CIMA
Reply To #321 by toppeta
Saturday, 8 Aug 1998 , 11:19 PM EDT Post # of 374
Haven't looked in since Tuesday so am a little late responding. It's rumored Guido held an invitation-only meeting in a private
La Paz mining club last Tuesday night. Seven majors were supposedly present. I'm waiting for confirmation from another
source.>>>



To: E. Charters who wrote (12177)8/10/1998 5:59:00 PM
From: RMF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34075
 
E.C.

Looking back through the 8k's I just noticed that Guido did a TOTAL of 10 days fieldwork to get enough samples to justify his original conclusion of an inferred resource of 111,414,800 ozs.

Felderhof was NEVER in Guido's league.



To: E. Charters who wrote (12177)8/10/1998 9:31:00 PM
From: Cytotekk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34075
 
E. - in your experience, will the BD geologists be painfully truthful in a statement, pro or con, early on when they have their findings? Or will they couch and let us dangle for awhile before the bitter finale if the news is bad? Do they allow only the contracting company to issue news, good or bad?

Colleen