Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich_1 who wrote (51115)	8/10/1998 6:34:00 PM
From: Joe Master	Respond to of 55532

No I am not an idiot try taking a look in mirror. I sold you held. I have money which I have doubled since December in Lucent which I bought on the day after I sold RMIL (Thank you very much). (I thought about selling at 103 but decided to hang on). You now have a worthless stock that is not likely to ever trade again. You are the one that sounds bitter. (and if you aren't you should be). Here are the flaws in your thoughts: 1. Even if a short squeeze is possible a company must be real to make it go. Since there are no fundamentals the stock cannot trade. If it cannot trade it cannot be squeezed. 2. Bmart's dd is interesting to say the least but unfortunately many of the "facts" he tries to bring are just plain wrong. Sure the addresses of these companies all point to Mork. What good stuff has he ever found on Kugler that would make any type of direct "inside" connection to a shorting operation.? Or Tonto for that matter? So somebody named Martin recieved some 144 shares in GIFS although it seems likely this could be our S Martin is there any proof? And does this mean anythiong other than he was an insider on another stock. Did he short it. If so fine but does that have anything to do here? 3. The SEC, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg's and Wired have all basically laughed at the company that is RMIL. You think they are all in on some grand sceme to protect a scum like Mork? 4. Let's see some direct proof that anybody (except Morks 98,500 shares) is short anything on this stock. Shareholders are still recieving the shares they request (as of a week ago or so). Thus the shares that are in cert form have not exceeded the shares available from the TA. If their was a big short position then this would not be possible. By what reasoning do you think the squeeze "will no doubt happen".

To: Rich_1 who wrote (51115)	8/10/1998 10:39:00 PM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

>>>I did not make an investment here because I thought that this was a great company. I did so because of the strong potential for a short squeeze which, no doubt, will happen.<<< Rich_1, When you made your investment, did the thought ever occur to you that in order to reap your reward the company would need to have sufficient fundamentals to continue trading? If so, did you ever do any DD on your own?....or did you just rely on your gym-mate Pugs like joey did when he heard about this grand "opportunity" while standing behind someone at a phone booth? Your constant theme that nobody would post here if they didn't have a vested interest in the stock is totally off base to those who read SI. Every thread that I have ever read on SI and elsewhere has its share of nays....why would this one be different? TC