To: john mock who wrote (808 ) 8/10/1998 6:26:00 PM From: Warren A. Wilbur, Jr. Respond to of 40688
Mock, (and guess what, I didn't write it, guess other people are sick of you as well !) y: ROB_ART Reply To #412 by Bouf Sunday, 12 Jul 1998 , 10:44 PM EDT Post # of 626 Dear Mr. Mock, (you certainly are living up to your name) I am curious as to why you have condemned this company so quickly. I have been involved with technical development work for almost 10 years in the medical industry and I can tell you that no matter what people put down as their timeline for completion it predictably takes longer. Whenever any complex project is embarked on you will ALWAYS, ALWAYS, find many problems which were not anticipated when you started the work. It is simply the nature of creating something new. I don't think that PNLK is failing to meet their goals simply because a timeline slips a few weeks. If you have any experience in complex business development you would be aware of this. I am looking at the quality of the companies who are "in bed" with PNLK i.e. Unz and Co, Zagoren, and the others. I know from personal experience that the best indicator of a company's eventual success is a proven track record of the people in management. At this stage I would say that the key players outside of PNLK are Zagoren and Proxicom. All one needs to do is look at the work they have done in the past and future projects to know they are likely to succeed again. Of course, it is possible that all of the information that is available on PNLK through the investors package (which I assume you must have read) and the press releases are a pack of lies. I guess if a lot of people don't mind jail terms for securities fraud this could be the explanation. I personally doubt this is likely. Todd (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- long; ST Rating- strong buy; LT Rating- strong buy) ***One more thing Mock, we don't blame anybody for anything.